The Intersection of AB705 on Race and Individuals With Developmental Disabilities: Striving for Student Equity Through Eliminating Developmental Education

Elizabeth A. Craigg
{"title":"The Intersection of AB705 on Race and Individuals With Developmental Disabilities: Striving for Student Equity Through Eliminating Developmental Education","authors":"Elizabeth A. Craigg","doi":"10.17265/2161-6248/2020.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the author sat in a meeting exploring what we plan on doing as a department to handle the changes AB705 was going to bring to our course offerings, one of his peers stated, “We are finally going to give African-American students a chance that they didn’t have.” Being the only African-American faculty member who participates in the English department professional development activities, the author asked a question, “What were we doing before?” The meeting became awkwardly silent. Like most community colleges around African-American men are more likely to attend community colleges. On October 13, 2017, the Governor of California passed AB705 that was set to be implemented on January 1, 2018, but all California community colleges must be compliant by Fall 2019. The intent of AB705 was to statistically improve community college completion and/or transfer rates to a four-year institution through eliminating developmental English (and Math) courses since the testing placement into Math and English was arbitrary. Organizations and proponents of the bill emphasize AB705 creates a level of equity amongst minority students and white students that some would even call its implementation eliminates the college achievement gap. The passage, and now inevitable implementation, revealed three things: 1. There was an assumption that reading and writing was of one discipline; 2. There was a profession of developmental education built on the backs of a majority of black and brown students—educational inequity amongst white and black students; and 3. The very existence of developmental education is rooted in implied bias. California Community College Faculty is still 70% White, while the students who are in these developmental classes are over 70% Black and Latino male. This paper is an evaluation of California’s AB705 Law that will be utilized as an open-discussion of the following: (a) the educational conditions that led to the implementation of AB705; (b) the description of AB705; (c) how colleges have interpreted and implemented AB705; (d) consider the intersection of race and students with disabilities; and (e) the recommendations for implementing AB705. Thus, the overall premise for the paper would be for community colleges need to re-create college-transfer-level English with a growth mindset.","PeriodicalId":159185,"journal":{"name":"US-China education review","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"US-China education review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6248/2020.03.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the author sat in a meeting exploring what we plan on doing as a department to handle the changes AB705 was going to bring to our course offerings, one of his peers stated, “We are finally going to give African-American students a chance that they didn’t have.” Being the only African-American faculty member who participates in the English department professional development activities, the author asked a question, “What were we doing before?” The meeting became awkwardly silent. Like most community colleges around African-American men are more likely to attend community colleges. On October 13, 2017, the Governor of California passed AB705 that was set to be implemented on January 1, 2018, but all California community colleges must be compliant by Fall 2019. The intent of AB705 was to statistically improve community college completion and/or transfer rates to a four-year institution through eliminating developmental English (and Math) courses since the testing placement into Math and English was arbitrary. Organizations and proponents of the bill emphasize AB705 creates a level of equity amongst minority students and white students that some would even call its implementation eliminates the college achievement gap. The passage, and now inevitable implementation, revealed three things: 1. There was an assumption that reading and writing was of one discipline; 2. There was a profession of developmental education built on the backs of a majority of black and brown students—educational inequity amongst white and black students; and 3. The very existence of developmental education is rooted in implied bias. California Community College Faculty is still 70% White, while the students who are in these developmental classes are over 70% Black and Latino male. This paper is an evaluation of California’s AB705 Law that will be utilized as an open-discussion of the following: (a) the educational conditions that led to the implementation of AB705; (b) the description of AB705; (c) how colleges have interpreted and implemented AB705; (d) consider the intersection of race and students with disabilities; and (e) the recommendations for implementing AB705. Thus, the overall premise for the paper would be for community colleges need to re-create college-transfer-level English with a growth mindset.
AB705关于种族和发育性残疾个体的交叉:通过消除发展性教育争取学生公平
当作者坐在一个会议上探讨我们作为一个部门计划做些什么来应对AB705将给我们的课程提供带来的变化时,他的一个同龄人说:“我们终于要给非裔美国学生一个他们没有的机会了。”作为唯一一位参加英语系专业发展活动的非裔美国教师,作者问了一个问题:“我们以前在做什么?”会议陷入尴尬的沉默。像大多数社区大学一样,非洲裔美国人更有可能进入社区大学。2017年10月13日,加利福尼亚州州长通过了AB705,该法案将于2018年1月1日实施,但所有加州社区大学必须在2019年秋季之前遵守该法案。AB705的目的是通过取消发展性英语(和数学)课程,从统计上提高社区大学的完成率和/或转学到四年制大学,因为数学和英语的测试安排是任意的。该法案的组织和支持者强调,AB705法案在少数族裔学生和白人学生之间创造了一定程度的平等,有些人甚至认为,该法案的实施消除了大学成绩差距。这篇文章,以及现在不可避免的实施,揭示了三件事:有一种假设认为阅读和写作是同一门学科;2. 建立在大多数黑人和棕色人种学生的基础上的发展教育专业——白人和黑人学生之间的教育不平等;和3。发展性教育的存在根植于隐性偏见。加州社区学院的教职员工中仍有70%是白人,而这些发展型班级的学生中有70%以上是黑人和拉丁裔男性。本文是对加州AB705法律的评估,将被用作以下方面的公开讨论:(a)导致AB705实施的教育条件;(b) AB705的描述;(三)各院校如何解释和实施AB705;(d)考虑种族与残疾学生的交集;(e)实施AB705的建议。因此,本文的总体前提是社区学院需要以成长的心态重新创造大学转学水平的英语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信