Will consumers give us another chance to bounce back? Effects of precrisis commitments to social and product responsibility on brand resilience

Jiyun Kang, Amy A. Faria, Judy M. Lee, W. Choi
{"title":"Will consumers give us another chance to bounce back? Effects of precrisis commitments to social and product responsibility on brand resilience","authors":"Jiyun Kang, Amy A. Faria, Judy M. Lee, W. Choi","doi":"10.1108/jpbm-03-2022-3899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nMerely being known as a highly ethical or strong performer cannot shield a company from every kind of crisis. From product failures to environmental and social issues, a brand’s ability to manage crises and rapidly regain consumer trust is essential. This study aims to explore whether consumer perceptions of a brands’ prior commitments to two different areas of corporate responsibility (social and product responsibility) alleviate the postcrisis attribution of accountability and further build brand resilience, examining differences between two types of crisis situations – values versus performance crises.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA scenario-based online survey on product versus ethical labor issues was conducted. The data were collected from a highly valid, nationwide sample set of more than a thousand US consumers. Multigroup structural equation modeling was used as the primary data analysis method.\n\n\nFindings\nA brand’s precrisis commitment to social responsibility was found to decrease attribution of accountability across both types of crises. It also strengthened brand resilience, but this effect was more prevalent in a performance than a values crisis. The effects of precrisis commitment to product responsibility on brand resilience were minimal or insignificant across crisis types.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nPrevious research underexplores which types of corporate responsibility commitments provide a firm with a better protection against crises. This study significantly advances the knowledge regarding the type of commitments that can substantially increase brand resilience, which supports the rationale of making stronger commitments to social responsibility than to product responsibility. Practical insights are provided into how investments in corporate social responsibility help alleviate consumers’ negative perceptions during the outbreak of a brand crisis and build more brand muscle that enables resilience against future crises.\n","PeriodicalId":114857,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product & Brand Management","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product & Brand Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-03-2022-3899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose Merely being known as a highly ethical or strong performer cannot shield a company from every kind of crisis. From product failures to environmental and social issues, a brand’s ability to manage crises and rapidly regain consumer trust is essential. This study aims to explore whether consumer perceptions of a brands’ prior commitments to two different areas of corporate responsibility (social and product responsibility) alleviate the postcrisis attribution of accountability and further build brand resilience, examining differences between two types of crisis situations – values versus performance crises. Design/methodology/approach A scenario-based online survey on product versus ethical labor issues was conducted. The data were collected from a highly valid, nationwide sample set of more than a thousand US consumers. Multigroup structural equation modeling was used as the primary data analysis method. Findings A brand’s precrisis commitment to social responsibility was found to decrease attribution of accountability across both types of crises. It also strengthened brand resilience, but this effect was more prevalent in a performance than a values crisis. The effects of precrisis commitment to product responsibility on brand resilience were minimal or insignificant across crisis types. Originality/value Previous research underexplores which types of corporate responsibility commitments provide a firm with a better protection against crises. This study significantly advances the knowledge regarding the type of commitments that can substantially increase brand resilience, which supports the rationale of making stronger commitments to social responsibility than to product responsibility. Practical insights are provided into how investments in corporate social responsibility help alleviate consumers’ negative perceptions during the outbreak of a brand crisis and build more brand muscle that enables resilience against future crises.
消费者会再给我们一次反弹的机会吗?危机前对社会和产品责任的承诺对品牌弹性的影响
仅仅被认为是道德高尚或表现出色的公司,并不能使一家公司免受各种危机的影响。从产品失败到环境和社会问题,一个品牌应对危机并迅速重获消费者信任的能力至关重要。本研究旨在探讨消费者对品牌在两个不同的企业责任领域(社会责任和产品责任)的先前承诺的看法是否会减轻危机后的责任归因,并进一步建立品牌弹性,研究两种危机情况之间的差异-价值观危机与绩效危机。设计/方法/方法对产品与道德劳工问题进行了基于场景的在线调查。这些数据是从全国范围内一千多名美国消费者的高度有效的样本中收集的。采用多组结构方程模型作为主要数据分析方法。研究发现,品牌在危机前对社会责任的承诺会降低两种危机中的责任归属。它也增强了品牌弹性,但这种效应在业绩方面更为普遍,而不是价值观危机。危机前对产品责任的承诺对品牌弹性的影响在危机类型中是最小的或不显著的。原创性/价值先前的研究没有充分探讨哪种类型的企业责任承诺能更好地保护企业免受危机的影响。本研究显著地推进了关于承诺类型的知识,这些承诺可以大幅提高品牌弹性,这支持了对社会责任的承诺比对产品责任的承诺更强的理论基础。在品牌危机爆发期间,对企业社会责任的投资如何帮助减轻消费者的负面看法,并建立更多的品牌力量,使其能够抵御未来的危机,提供了实用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信