Back to the Future: “De-Transition” to Low-Car Cities

IF 2.5
Chloé Taillandier, M. Dijk, Martial Vialleix
{"title":"Back to the Future: “De-Transition” to Low-Car Cities","authors":"Chloé Taillandier, M. Dijk, Martial Vialleix","doi":"10.3390/futuretransp3020046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current urban mobility systems in Europe, characterized by high car mobility shares, have negative environmental and health impacts but struggle to mitigate these for fear of sacrificing accessibility. Ironically, before the car mobility transition (in the 1950s and 1960s in Western countries and the 1990s in Eastern Europe), most cities were accessible by walking, cycling, public transport, and by the few cars there were. Through a longitudinal case study of a medium-sized urban area in Clermont-Ferrand, France (1950–2022), this paper explores the potential to ‘de-transition’, i.e., to reverse the urban transition process towards ‘accessible, low-car cities’ by reshaping infrastructures to constrain car use whilst accommodating walking, cycling, and public transport. We answer the following questions: To what extent can cities reverse the urban car mobility transition? How could such a process be further encouraged? Our analysis adopts a social practices perspective and uses a mixed-methods approach by combining semi-structured interviews, a survey, and a document analysis. On the one hand, our findings highlight the difficulty of an urban modality shift to car alternatives: (1) the limited reach of public transformation networks (in Clermont-Ferrand, the tramline); (2) the fact that many feel unsafe or assume they need excellent health conditions to cycle, which is associated with leisure and sports; and (3) strong convictions concerning the usefulness of vehicle ownership, which is believed to maximise comfort. On the other hand, based on a historic analysis, we offer practical recommendations to de-transition to low-car urban areas: (1) the creation of an extensive regional tramway network; (2) the development of a full cycling network; and (3) the promotion of an extensive car-free city centre.","PeriodicalId":238233,"journal":{"name":"Future Transportation","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp3020046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current urban mobility systems in Europe, characterized by high car mobility shares, have negative environmental and health impacts but struggle to mitigate these for fear of sacrificing accessibility. Ironically, before the car mobility transition (in the 1950s and 1960s in Western countries and the 1990s in Eastern Europe), most cities were accessible by walking, cycling, public transport, and by the few cars there were. Through a longitudinal case study of a medium-sized urban area in Clermont-Ferrand, France (1950–2022), this paper explores the potential to ‘de-transition’, i.e., to reverse the urban transition process towards ‘accessible, low-car cities’ by reshaping infrastructures to constrain car use whilst accommodating walking, cycling, and public transport. We answer the following questions: To what extent can cities reverse the urban car mobility transition? How could such a process be further encouraged? Our analysis adopts a social practices perspective and uses a mixed-methods approach by combining semi-structured interviews, a survey, and a document analysis. On the one hand, our findings highlight the difficulty of an urban modality shift to car alternatives: (1) the limited reach of public transformation networks (in Clermont-Ferrand, the tramline); (2) the fact that many feel unsafe or assume they need excellent health conditions to cycle, which is associated with leisure and sports; and (3) strong convictions concerning the usefulness of vehicle ownership, which is believed to maximise comfort. On the other hand, based on a historic analysis, we offer practical recommendations to de-transition to low-car urban areas: (1) the creation of an extensive regional tramway network; (2) the development of a full cycling network; and (3) the promotion of an extensive car-free city centre.
回到未来:向低车城市“去转型”
欧洲目前的城市交通系统的特点是汽车交通份额很高,对环境和健康产生了负面影响,但由于担心牺牲可达性,很难减轻这些影响。具有讽刺意味的是,在汽车交通转型之前(20世纪50年代和60年代在西方国家,90年代在东欧),大多数城市都可以通过步行、骑自行车、公共交通和为数不多的汽车到达。通过对法国克莱蒙费朗一个中型城市地区(1950-2022)的纵向案例研究,本文探讨了“去转型”的潜力,即通过重塑基础设施来限制汽车的使用,同时容纳步行、骑自行车和公共交通,从而扭转城市向“无障碍、低汽车城市”的转型过程。我们回答以下问题:城市能在多大程度上扭转城市汽车出行的转型?怎样才能进一步鼓励这一进程?我们的分析采用社会实践的视角,并结合半结构化访谈、调查和文献分析,采用混合方法。一方面,我们的研究结果强调了城市交通方式向汽车替代方式转变的难度:(1)公共交通网络(克莱蒙费朗的有轨电车)的覆盖范围有限;(2)许多人感到不安全或认为他们需要良好的健康状况才能骑自行车,这与休闲和运动有关;(3)对拥有汽车的有用性有强烈的信念,人们认为拥有汽车能最大限度地提高舒适度。另一方面,在历史分析的基础上,我们提出了向低车城市地区过渡的实用建议:(1)建立广泛的区域有轨电车网络;(2)发展全循环网络;(3)推广广泛的无车市中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书