Robert Browning’s Experiment: Composition and Communication in The Ring and the Book

Philipp Erchinger
{"title":"Robert Browning’s Experiment: Composition and Communication in The Ring and the Book","authors":"Philipp Erchinger","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474438957.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter concentrates on Robert Browning’s The Ring and the Book, a series of twelve dramatic monologues, which has repeatedly been described as an instance of “empiricism in literature” (Langbaum) and as one of “the most ambitious literary experiments in the period” (Slinn). Trying to substantiate and make good on such claims, the chapter argues that The Ring and the Book invites its readers to participate in the composition and evaluation of an experimental form that transfers the tradition of the epic into “a novel country” in order to create a mode of writing “in difficulties” and “encumbered with incongruities” (Walter Bagehot). As a result, The Ring and the Book refuses to be read as if it were an accomplished work. Rather, it has to be made to work. Presenting itself as an experimental arrangement, Browning’s multi-voiced and many-sided text demands its readers to follow the grain of a kaleidoscopic pattern in the making, the components of which lack an underlying ground or design to hold them in place. The chapter’s argument is developed by way of an engagement with the controversial Victorian reception of Browning’s long poem.","PeriodicalId":244672,"journal":{"name":"Artful Experiments","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artful Experiments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474438957.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter concentrates on Robert Browning’s The Ring and the Book, a series of twelve dramatic monologues, which has repeatedly been described as an instance of “empiricism in literature” (Langbaum) and as one of “the most ambitious literary experiments in the period” (Slinn). Trying to substantiate and make good on such claims, the chapter argues that The Ring and the Book invites its readers to participate in the composition and evaluation of an experimental form that transfers the tradition of the epic into “a novel country” in order to create a mode of writing “in difficulties” and “encumbered with incongruities” (Walter Bagehot). As a result, The Ring and the Book refuses to be read as if it were an accomplished work. Rather, it has to be made to work. Presenting itself as an experimental arrangement, Browning’s multi-voiced and many-sided text demands its readers to follow the grain of a kaleidoscopic pattern in the making, the components of which lack an underlying ground or design to hold them in place. The chapter’s argument is developed by way of an engagement with the controversial Victorian reception of Browning’s long poem.
罗伯特·布朗宁的实验:《指环与书》中的构成与交流
本章集中讨论罗伯特·勃朗宁的《指环与书》,这是一部由12段戏剧性独白组成的系列作品,它被多次描述为“文学中的经验主义”(朗鲍姆)和“那个时期最雄心勃勃的文学实验”之一(斯林)。本章试图证实并证明这种说法,认为《指环与书》邀请读者参与一种实验性形式的创作和评价,这种形式将史诗的传统转移到“一个新颖的国家”,以创造一种“在困难中”和“被不协调所困扰”的写作模式(沃尔特·白芝浩)。因此,《魔戒与魔书》拒绝把它当作一部完成的作品来读。相反,必须让它发挥作用。作为一种实验性的安排,勃朗宁的多声音和多方面的文本要求读者跟随万花筒图案的纹理,这些图案的组成部分缺乏一个潜在的基础或设计来保持它们的位置。本章的论点是通过参与有争议的维多利亚接受勃朗宁的长诗的方式发展起来的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信