The American Thinker

A. Brown
{"title":"The American Thinker","authors":"A. Brown","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197565131.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 1 establishes Thurman’s place within modern American thought, arguing that he is part of the American pragmatist tradition. Thurman inherited pragmatism from William James by way of W. E. B. Du Bois and Rufus Jones. Du Bois applied James’s ideas about people’s “blindness” to the experiences of others and the theory that social norms could evolve over time, through human agency, to better represent the needs of the democratic whole to his ideas about Black agitation and activism—a school of thinking within which Thurman was educated and nurtured. Thurman’s liberal theological component, especially his mysticism, is best understood through the James-Jones lineage. Rufus Jones drew off of James’s secular theories on mystical experience to popularize a culture of religious seeking and the pursuit of spiritual truth. Informed by his Quaker background, Jones theorized that the individual could reach points of heightened consciousness and could achieve a sense of oneness with a divine truth (James did not specify what this universal truth was, but Jones insisted that it was God). Both James and Jones favored affirmation mysticism—the idea that once a person experienced wholeness with the rest of the universe that he would be motivated and even responsible for attempting to create the same synchronicity within the society that he lived. Thurman, who had mystical leanings since childhood but could never fully articulate his insights on spirituality, felt as though he found a kindred spirit after he encountered one of Jones’s books on mysticism in 1929. The discovery led Thurman to study under Jones at Haverford that spring (with special permission from the college since Haverford did not admit Black students at that point). Thurman emerged from Haverford armed with a sophisticated grasp of affirmation mysticism that he connected seamlessly to his activist education. Through close readings of James, Du Bois, Jones, and Thurman, the chapter argues that Thurman’s pragmatist heritage both establishes him as a distinctly modern American thinker and sets the Fellowship Church—the physical expression of his ideas—as a distinctly modern American institution.","PeriodicalId":384855,"journal":{"name":"The Fellowship Church","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Fellowship Church","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197565131.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 1 establishes Thurman’s place within modern American thought, arguing that he is part of the American pragmatist tradition. Thurman inherited pragmatism from William James by way of W. E. B. Du Bois and Rufus Jones. Du Bois applied James’s ideas about people’s “blindness” to the experiences of others and the theory that social norms could evolve over time, through human agency, to better represent the needs of the democratic whole to his ideas about Black agitation and activism—a school of thinking within which Thurman was educated and nurtured. Thurman’s liberal theological component, especially his mysticism, is best understood through the James-Jones lineage. Rufus Jones drew off of James’s secular theories on mystical experience to popularize a culture of religious seeking and the pursuit of spiritual truth. Informed by his Quaker background, Jones theorized that the individual could reach points of heightened consciousness and could achieve a sense of oneness with a divine truth (James did not specify what this universal truth was, but Jones insisted that it was God). Both James and Jones favored affirmation mysticism—the idea that once a person experienced wholeness with the rest of the universe that he would be motivated and even responsible for attempting to create the same synchronicity within the society that he lived. Thurman, who had mystical leanings since childhood but could never fully articulate his insights on spirituality, felt as though he found a kindred spirit after he encountered one of Jones’s books on mysticism in 1929. The discovery led Thurman to study under Jones at Haverford that spring (with special permission from the college since Haverford did not admit Black students at that point). Thurman emerged from Haverford armed with a sophisticated grasp of affirmation mysticism that he connected seamlessly to his activist education. Through close readings of James, Du Bois, Jones, and Thurman, the chapter argues that Thurman’s pragmatist heritage both establishes him as a distinctly modern American thinker and sets the Fellowship Church—the physical expression of his ideas—as a distinctly modern American institution.
美国思想家
第一章确立了瑟曼在现代美国思想中的地位,认为他是美国实用主义传统的一部分。瑟曼通过杜波依斯和鲁弗斯·琼斯继承了威廉·詹姆斯的实用主义。杜波依斯将詹姆斯关于人的“盲目”的观点应用到他人的经历中,将社会规范可以随着时间的推移而进化的理论,通过人类的代理,更好地代表民主整体的需求,应用到他关于黑人骚动和行动主义的观点中——瑟曼就是在这种思想流派中受到教育和培养的。瑟曼的自由主义神学成分,尤其是他的神秘主义,最好通过詹姆斯-琼斯的血统来理解。鲁弗斯·琼斯借鉴了詹姆斯关于神秘经验的世俗理论,推广了一种宗教寻求和追求精神真理的文化。由于他的贵格会背景,琼斯认为个人可以达到更高的意识,并能与神圣的真理达到一种统一的感觉(詹姆斯没有具体说明这个普遍的真理是什么,但琼斯坚持认为这就是上帝)。詹姆斯和琼斯都赞成肯定的神秘主义——这种观点认为,一旦一个人与宇宙的其余部分经历了整体性,他就会被激励,甚至有责任试图在他所生活的社会中创造同样的同步性。瑟曼从小就有神秘主义倾向,但从未完全表达出他对灵性的见解。1929年,他读了琼斯的一本关于神秘主义的书后,觉得自己找到了志同道合的人。这一发现使瑟曼那年春天在哈弗福德大学跟随琼斯学习(得到了学院的特别许可,因为哈弗福德当时不招收黑人学生)。瑟曼从哈弗福德毕业,对肯定主义神秘主义有着深刻的理解,他将这种理解与自己的激进主义教育无缝地联系在一起。通过对詹姆斯、杜波依斯、琼斯和瑟曼的仔细阅读,本章认为瑟曼的实用主义遗产既使他成为一位独特的现代美国思想家,又使联谊教会——他思想的实际表达——成为一个独特的现代美国机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信