The Relevance of Criminal Law in Intellectual Property Law Research

A. Sharma, Dipa Dube
{"title":"The Relevance of Criminal Law in Intellectual Property Law Research","authors":"A. Sharma, Dipa Dube","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198826743.003.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intellectual property (IP) law protects the private rights of owners, while criminal law secures the public interests, for harm to the society. In the present technology-driven society, magnitude of IP violations, particularly, in the form of counterfeiting, etc. affect the interests of the general public, calling for the application of criminal law to ensure stringent IP protection. The intersection of IP and criminal law remains controversial, yet significant, as it is in the interest of those in the field to examine the provisions beyond the scope of private right regime, as a public policy that can have a direct impact on public interests. This chapter analyses the intersection of criminal law and IP through a blend of exploratory and analytical methods. First, the authors situate the criminal law discussion in the domain of IP rights and examine how far the elements of crime may be identified in IP violations. Second, the concept of economic crimes as distinct from conventional crimes is discussed. In this regard, the laws of India, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (US) are examined, along with the most recent international developments, to show the trend towards criminal enforcement as the best possible protection for legitimate businesses and consumers. The chapter leaves much scope for future work whereby a balanced response to counter IP violations may be designed to benefit innovation and development.","PeriodicalId":440385,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of Intellectual Property Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of Intellectual Property Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198826743.003.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Intellectual property (IP) law protects the private rights of owners, while criminal law secures the public interests, for harm to the society. In the present technology-driven society, magnitude of IP violations, particularly, in the form of counterfeiting, etc. affect the interests of the general public, calling for the application of criminal law to ensure stringent IP protection. The intersection of IP and criminal law remains controversial, yet significant, as it is in the interest of those in the field to examine the provisions beyond the scope of private right regime, as a public policy that can have a direct impact on public interests. This chapter analyses the intersection of criminal law and IP through a blend of exploratory and analytical methods. First, the authors situate the criminal law discussion in the domain of IP rights and examine how far the elements of crime may be identified in IP violations. Second, the concept of economic crimes as distinct from conventional crimes is discussed. In this regard, the laws of India, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (US) are examined, along with the most recent international developments, to show the trend towards criminal enforcement as the best possible protection for legitimate businesses and consumers. The chapter leaves much scope for future work whereby a balanced response to counter IP violations may be designed to benefit innovation and development.
刑法在知识产权法研究中的意义
知识产权法保护所有者的私人权利,刑法保障公共利益,对社会造成危害。在当今技术驱动的社会中,知识产权侵权的规模,特别是以假冒等形式存在的侵权行为,影响到广大公众的利益,需要运用刑法来确保严格的知识产权保护。知识产权与刑法的交叉仍然存在争议,但意义重大,因为作为一项可以对公共利益产生直接影响的公共政策,审查私人权利制度范围之外的规定符合该领域人士的利益。本章采用探索性和分析性相结合的方法分析刑法与知识产权的交集。首先,作者将刑法讨论置于知识产权领域,并考察了侵犯知识产权的犯罪要素可以确定到何种程度。其次,论述了经济犯罪与常规犯罪的区别。在这方面,研究了印度、联合王国和美国的法律,以及最近的国际发展,以表明刑事执法的趋势是对合法企业和消费者的最佳保护。本章为未来的工作留下了很大的空间,从而可以设计出平衡的应对措施来打击侵犯知识产权的行为,从而有利于创新和发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信