Third-Party Funding of Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution in Hong Kong

K. Rooney
{"title":"Third-Party Funding of Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution in Hong Kong","authors":"K. Rooney","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2018013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In June 2017, Hong Kong passed legislation amending the Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance to permit third-party funding of arbitration, mediation, and related proceedings.These amendments had all taken effect by February 1, 2019. Hong Kong’s regulatory regime requires third-party funders to comply with the financial and ethical standards set out in the Code of Practice for Third Party Funders of Arbitration, issued on December 7, 2018. This article explains why Hong Kong concluded that third-party funding of arbitration, mediation, and related proceedings under the Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance should be allowed, why it needs to be regulated, and the key provisions at the heart of Hong’s Kong’s “light touch” regulatory approach embodied in the Code of Practice. The article also touches on a number of emerging issues, including whether an arbitral tribunal should have the power to make an adverse costs order against a third-party funder and the recoverability of the funder’s benefit under the funding agreement following Essar Oilfields Services Ltd. v. Norscott Rig Management Ltd.","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2018013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In June 2017, Hong Kong passed legislation amending the Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance to permit third-party funding of arbitration, mediation, and related proceedings.These amendments had all taken effect by February 1, 2019. Hong Kong’s regulatory regime requires third-party funders to comply with the financial and ethical standards set out in the Code of Practice for Third Party Funders of Arbitration, issued on December 7, 2018. This article explains why Hong Kong concluded that third-party funding of arbitration, mediation, and related proceedings under the Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance should be allowed, why it needs to be regulated, and the key provisions at the heart of Hong’s Kong’s “light touch” regulatory approach embodied in the Code of Practice. The article also touches on a number of emerging issues, including whether an arbitral tribunal should have the power to make an adverse costs order against a third-party funder and the recoverability of the funder’s benefit under the funding agreement following Essar Oilfields Services Ltd. v. Norscott Rig Management Ltd.
香港第三方资助仲裁及替代性争议解决
2017年6月,香港通过了修订《香港仲裁条例》的立法,允许第三方资助仲裁、调解和相关程序。这些修正案已于2019年2月1日生效。香港的监管制度要求第三方出资人遵守2018年12月7日发布的《第三方仲裁出资人实务守则》所载的财务和道德标准。本文解释香港为何认为应容许第三方资助《香港仲裁条例》下的仲裁、调解及相关程序,为何需要对其加以规管,以及实务守则所体现的香港“轻触式”规管方式的核心条文。本文还涉及了一些新出现的问题,包括仲裁庭是否有权对第三方出资人做出不利成本命令,以及在Essar Oilfields Services Ltd.诉Norscott Rig Management Ltd.案中,根据融资协议,出资人的利益是否可追回。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信