Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Technological Platforms as a Technology Transfer Tool: The Impact of French Technological Research Institutes on the Socio-Economic Performance of SMEs

Ruben Fotso
{"title":"Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Technological Platforms as a Technology Transfer Tool: The Impact of French Technological Research Institutes on the Socio-Economic Performance of SMEs","authors":"Ruben Fotso","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3728017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This objective of this paper is to evaluate and examine the impact of technological platforms used as technology transfer tools on the financial and employment variables of SMEs. To do so, it considers the French Technological Research Institute (TRI) known as “Nanoelec”, which is an interdisciplinary thematic institute which uses technological platforms to accelerate the transfer of innovation in companies. Using a matched difference-in-difference approach with the individual effects on panel data observed over the 2008–2016 period, empirical analysis shows that the TRI had a homogenous and significant effect on equity but no effect on employment variables. When cross-referenced against the length of participation in the TRI however, more heterogenous results emerged, showing that the TRI had an additional effect on all financial variables (turnover, equity and financial autonomy) and that this effect appears to concentrate on companies which have participated for longer (two to three years). Furthermore, the evaluation shows a clear positive effect on equity and financial autonomy among firms that collaborate with an Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) laboratory and a weak negative effect on net turnover for firms which receive “expertise” type treatment. Additional analysis indicates that the type of treatment has a more significant role to play than the length of involvement in the TRI.","PeriodicalId":206501,"journal":{"name":"European Economics: Labor & Social Conditions eJournal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economics: Labor & Social Conditions eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3728017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This objective of this paper is to evaluate and examine the impact of technological platforms used as technology transfer tools on the financial and employment variables of SMEs. To do so, it considers the French Technological Research Institute (TRI) known as “Nanoelec”, which is an interdisciplinary thematic institute which uses technological platforms to accelerate the transfer of innovation in companies. Using a matched difference-in-difference approach with the individual effects on panel data observed over the 2008–2016 period, empirical analysis shows that the TRI had a homogenous and significant effect on equity but no effect on employment variables. When cross-referenced against the length of participation in the TRI however, more heterogenous results emerged, showing that the TRI had an additional effect on all financial variables (turnover, equity and financial autonomy) and that this effect appears to concentrate on companies which have participated for longer (two to three years). Furthermore, the evaluation shows a clear positive effect on equity and financial autonomy among firms that collaborate with an Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) laboratory and a weak negative effect on net turnover for firms which receive “expertise” type treatment. Additional analysis indicates that the type of treatment has a more significant role to play than the length of involvement in the TRI.
技术平台作为技术转移工具的有效性评价:法国技术研究机构对中小企业社会经济绩效的影响
本文的目的是评估和检验作为技术转移工具的技术平台对中小企业财务和就业变量的影响。为此,它考虑了被称为“纳米电子”的法国技术研究所(TRI),这是一个跨学科的专题研究所,利用技术平台加速公司创新的转移。利用匹配的差异中差异方法,结合2008-2016年期间观察到的面板数据中的个体效应,实证分析表明,TRI对公平具有同质性且显著的影响,但对就业变量没有影响。然而,当对参与TRI的时间长短进行交叉参考时,出现了更多不同的结果,表明TRI对所有财务变量(营业额、股权和财务自主权)都有额外的影响,而且这种影响似乎集中在参与时间较长的公司(两到三年)。此外,评价表明,与原子能委员会(CEA)实验室合作的公司对股权和财务自主权有明显的积极影响,而接受“专门知识”类型治疗的公司对净营业额有微弱的负面影响。进一步的分析表明,在TRI中,治疗类型比参与时间的长短发挥更重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信