Myocardial scaring in ischemic heart diseases: role of late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac MRI

M. Abdullah, A. Abdelhady, Elsayed E. Elsayed, A. Ibrahim, M. Soliman
{"title":"Myocardial scaring in ischemic heart diseases: role of late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac MRI","authors":"M. Abdullah, A. Abdelhady, Elsayed E. Elsayed, A. Ibrahim, M. Soliman","doi":"10.4103/roaic.roaic_96_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To highlight the role of late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMRI) examination in the detection of location and transmural extent of myocardial scarring in relatively short CMRI examination duration. Background It is important to identify viable myocardium in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease to improve their long-term survival and to allow patients to avoid the risks associated with revascularization therapy. Patients and methods A total of 30 consecutive patients with suspected or having previous attack of ischemic heart disease were examined by different sequences of CMRI. Morphological, functional, and viability evaluation for distinction of viable and nonviable myocardium had been done by two independent observers. Results Regarding the distribution of LGE myocardium, almost perfect interobserver agreement was observed on per patient basis (κ=1.0 and 95% confidence interval=1.0–1.0) (P=1.0) and on per segment basis(κ=0.98 and 95% confidence interval=0.97–1.0) (P=0.84). On evaluation of transmural extent of LGE on per-segment basis, a substantial interobserver agreement was noted regarding the detection of 1–25% myocardial wall enhancement (κ=1.0 and 95% confidence interval=1.0–1.0). Otherwise, an almost perfect interobserver agreement was noted on detection of other degrees of mural extent of LGE (P=0.94). On correlation of segments with abnormal wall motion abnormalities and LGE, it was noticed that segmental wall motion abnormality could predict myocardial scarring with 58.08% sensitivity and 99.7% specificity; however, normal wall motion cannot exclude myocardial scarring. The overall duration needed for complete CMRI examination was ±35–40 min, with mean duration of 37.5±1.92 min. Conclusion CMR examination is a robust technique that can provide functional, morphological, and viability information in a relatively short CMRI examination duration (±35–40 min), which allow risk stratification of patients and predicting their outcomes.","PeriodicalId":151256,"journal":{"name":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_96_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To highlight the role of late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMRI) examination in the detection of location and transmural extent of myocardial scarring in relatively short CMRI examination duration. Background It is important to identify viable myocardium in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease to improve their long-term survival and to allow patients to avoid the risks associated with revascularization therapy. Patients and methods A total of 30 consecutive patients with suspected or having previous attack of ischemic heart disease were examined by different sequences of CMRI. Morphological, functional, and viability evaluation for distinction of viable and nonviable myocardium had been done by two independent observers. Results Regarding the distribution of LGE myocardium, almost perfect interobserver agreement was observed on per patient basis (κ=1.0 and 95% confidence interval=1.0–1.0) (P=1.0) and on per segment basis(κ=0.98 and 95% confidence interval=0.97–1.0) (P=0.84). On evaluation of transmural extent of LGE on per-segment basis, a substantial interobserver agreement was noted regarding the detection of 1–25% myocardial wall enhancement (κ=1.0 and 95% confidence interval=1.0–1.0). Otherwise, an almost perfect interobserver agreement was noted on detection of other degrees of mural extent of LGE (P=0.94). On correlation of segments with abnormal wall motion abnormalities and LGE, it was noticed that segmental wall motion abnormality could predict myocardial scarring with 58.08% sensitivity and 99.7% specificity; however, normal wall motion cannot exclude myocardial scarring. The overall duration needed for complete CMRI examination was ±35–40 min, with mean duration of 37.5±1.92 min. Conclusion CMR examination is a robust technique that can provide functional, morphological, and viability information in a relatively short CMRI examination duration (±35–40 min), which allow risk stratification of patients and predicting their outcomes.
缺血性心脏病的心肌恐吓:晚期钆增强心脏MRI的作用
目的探讨晚期钆增强心脏磁共振(LGE-CMRI)检查在相对较短的CMRI检查时间内检测心肌瘢痕的位置和跨壁范围的作用。背景:对于已知或疑似缺血性心脏病的患者,确定存活心肌对提高其长期生存率和避免与血运重建术治疗相关的风险具有重要意义。患者与方法对30例疑似或既往缺血性心脏病患者进行不同序列的CMRI检查。形态学、功能和活力评估,以区分有活力和无活力的心肌由两个独立的观察员。结果LGE心肌的分布在每例患者(κ=1.0, 95%可信区间=1.0 ~ 1.0)和每节段(κ=0.98, 95%可信区间=0.97 ~ 1.0)的观察者间几乎完全一致(P=0.84)。在以每段为基础评估LGE的跨壁范围时,关于检测到1-25%的心肌壁增强,观察者之间存在实质性的一致(κ=1.0, 95%置信区间=1.0 - 1.0)。此外,在检测LGE的其他程度的壁画范围时,观察者之间几乎完全一致(P=0.94)。关于壁运动异常节段与LGE的相关性,发现壁运动异常节段预测心肌瘢痕形成的敏感性为58.08%,特异性为99.7%;然而,正常的壁运动不能排除心肌瘢痕形成。完成CMRI检查所需的总时间为±35-40分钟,平均时间为37.5±1.92分钟。结论CMR检查是一种强大的技术,可以在相对较短的CMRI检查时间(±35-40分钟)内提供功能、形态学和生存能力信息,可以对患者进行风险分层并预测其预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信