Adapting an Integrated Program Evaluation for Promoting Competency‐Based Medical Education

Hyunjung Ju, Oh Minkyung, Jong-Tae Lee, B. Yoon
{"title":"Adapting an Integrated Program Evaluation for Promoting Competency‐Based Medical Education","authors":"Hyunjung Ju, Oh Minkyung, Jong-Tae Lee, B. Yoon","doi":"10.17496/KMER.2021.23.1.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Educational program evaluation can improve the quality of the curriculum, instructional methods, and resources and provide useful data for making educational decisions and policies. Developing and implementing a program evaluation system is essential in competency-based medical education. The purpose of this study was to explore and establish an educational program evaluation system adapting an integrated program evaluation model to promote competency-based medical education. First, an Educational Evaluation Committee was organized, consisting of faculty, staff members, and students. The committee established an integrated program evaluation model, combining Stufflebeam’s Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model of a process-oriented approach and Kirkpatrick’s four-level model of an outcome-oriented approach. Kirkpatrick’s model was applied to the product evaluation of the CIPP model. The committee then developed evaluation criteria, indicators, and data collection methods according to the components of the CIPP model and the four levels (reaction, learning, behavior, and results) of Kirkpatrick’s model, and collected and analyzed data. Finally, the committee reported the results of evaluation to a Medical Education Quality Improvement Committee, and the results were used to improve the curriculum and student selection. To enhance the quality of education, identifying educational deficiencies and developing various elements of education in a balanced way through educational evaluation will be needed. Furthermore, it will be necessary to listen to opinions of various stakeholders, work with all members involved in education, and communicate with decision-makers in the process of educational evaluation.","PeriodicalId":200174,"journal":{"name":"Korean Medical Education Review","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Medical Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17496/KMER.2021.23.1.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Educational program evaluation can improve the quality of the curriculum, instructional methods, and resources and provide useful data for making educational decisions and policies. Developing and implementing a program evaluation system is essential in competency-based medical education. The purpose of this study was to explore and establish an educational program evaluation system adapting an integrated program evaluation model to promote competency-based medical education. First, an Educational Evaluation Committee was organized, consisting of faculty, staff members, and students. The committee established an integrated program evaluation model, combining Stufflebeam’s Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model of a process-oriented approach and Kirkpatrick’s four-level model of an outcome-oriented approach. Kirkpatrick’s model was applied to the product evaluation of the CIPP model. The committee then developed evaluation criteria, indicators, and data collection methods according to the components of the CIPP model and the four levels (reaction, learning, behavior, and results) of Kirkpatrick’s model, and collected and analyzed data. Finally, the committee reported the results of evaluation to a Medical Education Quality Improvement Committee, and the results were used to improve the curriculum and student selection. To enhance the quality of education, identifying educational deficiencies and developing various elements of education in a balanced way through educational evaluation will be needed. Furthermore, it will be necessary to listen to opinions of various stakeholders, work with all members involved in education, and communicate with decision-makers in the process of educational evaluation.
适应综合项目评估促进以能力为本的医学教育
教育项目评估可以提高课程、教学方法和资源的质量,并为制定教育决策和政策提供有用的数据。在以能力为基础的医学教育中,建立和实施项目评估体系是必不可少的。本研究的目的在于探索并建立一套整合专案评估模式的教育专案评估体系,以促进胜任力医学教育。首先,成立了由教职员工和学生组成的教育评估委员会。委员会建立了一个综合项目评估模型,结合了Stufflebeam的面向过程方法的上下文、输入、过程和产品(CIPP)模型和Kirkpatrick的面向结果方法的四级模型。将Kirkpatrick模型应用于CIPP模型的产品评价。然后,委员会根据CIPP模型的组成部分和Kirkpatrick模型的四个层次(反应、学习、行为和结果)制定了评估标准、指标和数据收集方法,并收集和分析数据。最后,委员会将评估结果报告给医学教育质量改进委员会,并将结果用于改进课程和学生选拔。为了提高教育质量,需要通过教育评价来发现教育的不足,平衡发展教育的各种要素。此外,在教育评价过程中,需要听取各利益相关者的意见,与所有参与教育的成员合作,与决策者沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信