15 The role of trust in senior leaders’ experiences of using analytics to inform strategic health and care decisions

Elizabeth Ingram, S. Beardon, S. Cooper, D. Osborn, M. Gomes, H. Mcdonald, S. Hogarth, J. Sheringham
{"title":"15 The role of trust in senior leaders’ experiences of using analytics to inform strategic health and care decisions","authors":"Elizabeth Ingram, S. Beardon, S. Cooper, D. Osborn, M. Gomes, H. Mcdonald, S. Hogarth, J. Sheringham","doi":"10.1136/BMJOPEN-2021-QHRN.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Senior leaders make strategic decisions about the structure and delivery of health and care services. Analysis of pseudonymised administrative data from residents’ health or care records (analytics) aims to support high-quality strategic decisions, but its impacts depend on how analytics are perceived and used by senior decision-makers. Aim or objectives To understand how the process of generating knowledge from analytics could be enhanced for those making strategic health and care decisions. Methods Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 senior decision-makers from constituent organisations of North Central London’s Sustainability and Transformation Partnership. Interviews were analysed using the Framework Method. Results Trust emerged as a concept in participants’ experiences of using analytics in three key ways: data quality and accuracy; trust in sharing data for analytics; and trust between decision-makers. Firstly, participants expressed concerns around data quality and these shaped decision-making processes as some made decisions based on anecdotal information or gut feeling instead of untrusted data. Others sought ‘more accurate’ data, whilst some decisions were ‘stopped in their tracks’ because of a lack of trust in available data. Secondly, participants’ ability to obtain data was influenced by others’ willingness to share, itself driven by levels of trust in how that data will be subsequently analysed and used. Finally, a lack of trust between key leaders across health and care led to concerns that decisions based on analytics may act against individual organisational priorities and interests. Where personal trust between individuals across organisations existed, there was greater scope for decisions across organisational boundaries to be informed by analytics. Conclusions Trust is a key component of how senior leaders approach and use analytics. Developing trust in data quality and between leaders could influence if, when and how leaders obtain and use analytics to inform strategic health and care decisions.","PeriodicalId":364728,"journal":{"name":"Pre-recorded highlight presentations","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pre-recorded highlight presentations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJOPEN-2021-QHRN.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Senior leaders make strategic decisions about the structure and delivery of health and care services. Analysis of pseudonymised administrative data from residents’ health or care records (analytics) aims to support high-quality strategic decisions, but its impacts depend on how analytics are perceived and used by senior decision-makers. Aim or objectives To understand how the process of generating knowledge from analytics could be enhanced for those making strategic health and care decisions. Methods Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 senior decision-makers from constituent organisations of North Central London’s Sustainability and Transformation Partnership. Interviews were analysed using the Framework Method. Results Trust emerged as a concept in participants’ experiences of using analytics in three key ways: data quality and accuracy; trust in sharing data for analytics; and trust between decision-makers. Firstly, participants expressed concerns around data quality and these shaped decision-making processes as some made decisions based on anecdotal information or gut feeling instead of untrusted data. Others sought ‘more accurate’ data, whilst some decisions were ‘stopped in their tracks’ because of a lack of trust in available data. Secondly, participants’ ability to obtain data was influenced by others’ willingness to share, itself driven by levels of trust in how that data will be subsequently analysed and used. Finally, a lack of trust between key leaders across health and care led to concerns that decisions based on analytics may act against individual organisational priorities and interests. Where personal trust between individuals across organisations existed, there was greater scope for decisions across organisational boundaries to be informed by analytics. Conclusions Trust is a key component of how senior leaders approach and use analytics. Developing trust in data quality and between leaders could influence if, when and how leaders obtain and use analytics to inform strategic health and care decisions.
15信任在高层领导使用分析为健康和护理战略决策提供信息的经验中的作用
高级领导人就卫生和保健服务的结构和提供作出战略决策。对来自居民健康或护理记录的假名管理数据的分析(分析)旨在支持高质量的战略决策,但其影响取决于高级决策者如何感知和使用分析。目的或目标了解如何加强从分析中产生知识的过程,以帮助制定卫生和保健战略决策的人员。方法对20名来自伦敦中北部可持续发展与转型伙伴关系组成组织的高级决策者进行了个别半结构化访谈。访谈采用框架法进行分析。信任是参与者在三个关键方面使用分析的经验中出现的一个概念:数据质量和准确性;信任共享数据进行分析;决策者之间的信任。首先,与会者表达了对数据质量和这些影响决策过程的担忧,因为一些人根据轶事信息或直觉而不是不可信的数据做出决定。另一些人则寻求“更准确”的数据,而一些决策则因为对现有数据缺乏信任而“止步不前”。其次,参与者获取数据的能力受到他人分享意愿的影响,而分享意愿本身是由对随后如何分析和使用这些数据的信任程度所驱动的。最后,卫生和保健部门主要领导人之间缺乏信任,导致人们担心基于分析的决策可能违背组织的个人优先事项和利益。当跨组织的个人之间存在个人信任时,跨组织边界的决策就有更大的空间可以通过分析来获得信息。信任是高级领导者如何处理和使用分析的关键组成部分。建立对数据质量和领导者之间的信任可以影响领导者是否、何时以及如何获得和使用分析来为战略卫生和护理决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信