Modern Induction Machine Control Methods Comparison

T. Varga, T. Benšić, V. J. Štil, M. Barukčić
{"title":"Modern Induction Machine Control Methods Comparison","authors":"T. Varga, T. Benšić, V. J. Štil, M. Barukčić","doi":"10.1109/CANDO-EPE51100.2020.9337776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many methods for induction machine control were developed over the years, and each has some advantages over the other. This paper examines Stator Field Oriented Control (S-FOC) and Direct Torque Control with modulated voltage command (DTC-SVM). These methods were selected due to their similar control structure regarding the reference input. It is assumed that S-FOC should have better performance over DTC-SVM due to it's voltage decoupling scheme. After simulations of the induction machine during startup and load, using both control methods, it is concluded that both methods have satisfying performance regarding speed reference tracking, while DTC-SVM has higher torque ripple.","PeriodicalId":201378,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 3rd International Conference and Workshop in Óbuda on Electrical and Power Engineering (CANDO-EPE)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 3rd International Conference and Workshop in Óbuda on Electrical and Power Engineering (CANDO-EPE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CANDO-EPE51100.2020.9337776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many methods for induction machine control were developed over the years, and each has some advantages over the other. This paper examines Stator Field Oriented Control (S-FOC) and Direct Torque Control with modulated voltage command (DTC-SVM). These methods were selected due to their similar control structure regarding the reference input. It is assumed that S-FOC should have better performance over DTC-SVM due to it's voltage decoupling scheme. After simulations of the induction machine during startup and load, using both control methods, it is concluded that both methods have satisfying performance regarding speed reference tracking, while DTC-SVM has higher torque ripple.
现代感应电机控制方法比较
多年来,人们开发了许多感应电机控制方法,每种方法都有一些优点。本文研究了定子定向磁场控制(S-FOC)和电压调制命令直接转矩控制(DTC-SVM)。选择这些方法是因为它们对参考输入的控制结构相似。假设S-FOC的电压解耦方案比DTC-SVM具有更好的性能。通过对异步电机启动和加载过程的仿真,两种控制方法均具有较好的转速参考跟踪性能,而DTC-SVM具有较高的转矩脉动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信