A. Chaudhri, J. Mccann, P. Osmon
{"title":"A Performance Study of Object Database Management Systems","authors":"A. Chaudhri, J. Mccann, P. Osmon","doi":"10.1002/1096-9942(1999)5:4<263::AID-TAPO8>3.0.CO;2-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vendors of Object Database Management Systems (ODBMSs) have used a number of different architectural approaches for their products. Generally, most previously published ODBMS performance work focused on engineering applications and very little known about the suitability of ODBMS implementations for other application domains. In this paper, we redress this imbalance and evaluate three commercial products (two pure ODBMSs and one hybrid Object-Relational DBMS) to determine the suitability of each for six different application domains. Our results show statistically significant performance differences between the products under test. Furthermore, the hybrid product consistently performed badly on most of our tests. We also found that testing the scalability of products in terms of database size, as well as the choice of language interface, can be very important. Furthermore, the use of a dedicated database load utility can save considerable time when loading simple data, but generating complex data for the load utility requires considerable manual intervention. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.","PeriodicalId":293061,"journal":{"name":"Theory Pract. Object Syst.","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory Pract. Object Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9942(1999)5:4<263::AID-TAPO8>3.0.CO;2-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
对象数据库管理系统的性能研究
对象数据库管理系统(odbms)的供应商已经为他们的产品使用了许多不同的体系结构方法。一般来说,以前发表的大多数ODBMS性能工作都集中在工程应用程序上,很少有人知道ODBMS实现对其他应用程序领域的适用性。在本文中,我们纠正了这种不平衡,并评估了三个商业产品(两个纯odbms和一个混合对象-关系DBMS),以确定每个产品对六个不同应用领域的适用性。我们的结果显示,在测试产品之间存在统计学上显著的性能差异。此外,混合产品在我们的大多数测试中一直表现不佳。我们还发现,根据数据库大小以及语言接口的选择来测试产品的可伸缩性是非常重要的。此外,在加载简单数据时,使用专用的数据库加载实用程序可以节省大量时间,但是为加载实用程序生成复杂数据需要大量的人工干预。©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。