Quadruple Assessment using Transrectal Ultrasound Scan is Effective at Accurately Facilitating Choice of Excision Plane by Tems in the Complex Specc Lesion

C. Blane
{"title":"Quadruple Assessment using Transrectal Ultrasound Scan is Effective at Accurately Facilitating Choice of Excision Plane by Tems in the Complex Specc Lesion","authors":"C. Blane","doi":"10.47363/jsar/2023(4)149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is currently no consensus as to the optimal imaging modality for Significant Polyps and Early Colorectal Cancer (SPECC). This study describes the use of transrectal ultrasound (TRUSS) as part of a quadruple assessment process to evaluate the depth of invasion of SPECC lesions and guide local excision. Method: Pre-operative imaging and histology were reviewed for all patients undergoing transanal endoscopy microsurgery (TEMS) at Cheltenham General Hospital between 2013 and 2019. Treatment options included mucosectomy, partial thickness excision and full thickness excision. The dataset was studied specifically to evaluate the risk that malignancy will be present at the deep margin. ‘Failure’ of assessment was thus defined as the failure to detect and achieve complete local excision of malignancy. Results: 400 patients were included: 319 primary lesions and 81 secondary lesions. Amongst the primary lesions 93.7% (n=299) had successful R0 excisions. Of the primary lesions with incomplete excisions 50% (N=10) had undergone mucosectomy, 40% (n=8) full thickness excision and 10% (n=2) partial thickness excision","PeriodicalId":380400,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgery & Anesthesia Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgery & Anesthesia Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47363/jsar/2023(4)149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is currently no consensus as to the optimal imaging modality for Significant Polyps and Early Colorectal Cancer (SPECC). This study describes the use of transrectal ultrasound (TRUSS) as part of a quadruple assessment process to evaluate the depth of invasion of SPECC lesions and guide local excision. Method: Pre-operative imaging and histology were reviewed for all patients undergoing transanal endoscopy microsurgery (TEMS) at Cheltenham General Hospital between 2013 and 2019. Treatment options included mucosectomy, partial thickness excision and full thickness excision. The dataset was studied specifically to evaluate the risk that malignancy will be present at the deep margin. ‘Failure’ of assessment was thus defined as the failure to detect and achieve complete local excision of malignancy. Results: 400 patients were included: 319 primary lesions and 81 secondary lesions. Amongst the primary lesions 93.7% (n=299) had successful R0 excisions. Of the primary lesions with incomplete excisions 50% (N=10) had undergone mucosectomy, 40% (n=8) full thickness excision and 10% (n=2) partial thickness excision
经直肠超声扫描的四重评估对复杂病变的切除平面的选择是有效的
背景:目前对于重大息肉和早期结直肠癌(SPECC)的最佳成像方式尚未达成共识。本研究描述了使用经直肠超声(TRUSS)作为四重评估过程的一部分,以评估SPECC病变的侵袭深度并指导局部切除。方法:回顾2013 - 2019年切尔滕纳姆总医院经肛门内镜显微手术(TEMS)患者的术前影像学和组织学。治疗方案包括粘膜切除术、部分厚度切除术和全厚度切除术。对数据集进行了专门研究,以评估恶性肿瘤将出现在深缘的风险。因此,评估的“失败”被定义为未能发现并实现恶性肿瘤的局部完全切除。结果:纳入400例患者,原发病变319例,继发病变81例。在原发性病变中,93.7% (n=299)的R0切除成功。原发病变不完全切除中,50% (N=10)行粘膜切除术,40% (N= 8)行全层切除术,10% (N= 2)行部分厚度切除术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信