A Method Comparison on Multi-Label Questions Classification for Assessment-Based Personalised Scaffolding Adaptive Learning Path

Y. Wahyuningsih, A. Djunaidy, Daniel Oranova Siahaan
{"title":"A Method Comparison on Multi-Label Questions Classification for Assessment-Based Personalised Scaffolding Adaptive Learning Path","authors":"Y. Wahyuningsih, A. Djunaidy, Daniel Oranova Siahaan","doi":"10.1109/IConEEI55709.2022.9972269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classification of the topic of a question item is one of the fundamental problems in e-learning systems. Unlike single-label classification, the multi-label classification method simultaneously predicts more than one-class label. This research is a series of process development for a Personal Diagnostic system based on assessment. This system needs annotated question bank because multi-label question items can be used to build a Concept Effect Relationship (CER). The purpose of building CER is to track the failed concept of students who fail the formative tests. Hence, there is necessary in looking for a multi-label question classification method. Therefore, this paper compares several multi-label classification methods in determining subject topics associated with questions in a formative test question bank. This study investigates the non-neural-based and neural-based multi-label classification. The test results for the non-neural show that Term Frequency– Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) with Random Forest classifier produces the best hamming loss value (16,3%) while on neural, TF-IDF with convolutional neural network (CNN) produces a hamming loss value (21,2%) that is better than Long Short Term Memory (LSTM).","PeriodicalId":382763,"journal":{"name":"2022 3rd International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICon EEI)","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 3rd International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICon EEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IConEEI55709.2022.9972269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Classification of the topic of a question item is one of the fundamental problems in e-learning systems. Unlike single-label classification, the multi-label classification method simultaneously predicts more than one-class label. This research is a series of process development for a Personal Diagnostic system based on assessment. This system needs annotated question bank because multi-label question items can be used to build a Concept Effect Relationship (CER). The purpose of building CER is to track the failed concept of students who fail the formative tests. Hence, there is necessary in looking for a multi-label question classification method. Therefore, this paper compares several multi-label classification methods in determining subject topics associated with questions in a formative test question bank. This study investigates the non-neural-based and neural-based multi-label classification. The test results for the non-neural show that Term Frequency– Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) with Random Forest classifier produces the best hamming loss value (16,3%) while on neural, TF-IDF with convolutional neural network (CNN) produces a hamming loss value (21,2%) that is better than Long Short Term Memory (LSTM).
基于评估的个性化脚手架自适应学习路径多标签问题分类方法比较
题目主题的分类是电子学习系统的基本问题之一。与单标签分类不同,多标签分类方法同时预测多个类别的标签。本研究是基于评估的个人诊断系统的一系列开发过程。该系统需要标注题库,因为多标签题库可以用来建立概念效应关系(Concept Effect Relationship, CER)。建立CER的目的是追踪那些未能通过形成性测试的学生的失败概念。因此,有必要寻找一种多标签问题分类方法。因此,本文比较了几种多标签分类方法在确定形成性测试题库中与问题相关的主题时的效果。本研究探讨了基于神经和非神经的多标签分类。在非神经网络上的测试结果表明,使用随机森林分类器的Term Frequency - Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF)产生了最好的汉明损失值(16.3%),而在神经网络上,使用卷积神经网络(CNN)的TF-IDF产生的汉明损失值(21.2%)优于长短期记忆(LSTM)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信