The Effect of Adequate Funding and Health Service Provision on Micro Health Insurance Growth: The Case of BEPHA in the NWR of Cameroon

O. Obiamaka, N. A. Mom, K. Mayin
{"title":"The Effect of Adequate Funding and Health Service Provision on Micro Health Insurance Growth: The Case of BEPHA in the NWR of Cameroon","authors":"O. Obiamaka, N. A. Mom, K. Mayin","doi":"10.47672/ejhs.1223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Inadequate financial support and provision of poor-quality health services among the health facilities are major causes behind poor performance of Community Health Financing (CHF). The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of adequate funding and health service provision on micro health insurance growth, taking BEPHA as a case study. \nMethodology: The descriptive and explanatory research designs were used in this study. Data was collected by administering questionnaires to 400 respondents. Interviews were also carried out on 10 staff of BEPHA. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation, and multiple regression analysis. \nFindings: In results regarding BEPHA financing, 70% of those interviewed believed it is high while 30% indicated that it is low. Out of 400 participants 191 (47.8%) of them perceived services offered by BEPHA partner hospitals as fair while 182 (45.5%) perceived their services as good. The correlation results showed a strong positive and significant relationship between sufficiency of BEPHA financing (r= 0.802, p < 0.05) and quality of BEPHA health services (r = 0.667, p < 0.05) with the growth of BEPHA as a health insurance scheme. The multiple regression analysis results showed that sufficiency of BEPHA financing (β=0.166; p < 0.1), has a positive and significant effect on growth of BEPHA. The quality of BEPHA health services (β=0.200; p < 0.1) also has a significant positive effect on growth of BEPHA. Concisely, the study revealed that the funding and quality of BEPHA health services can determine the variations in the growth of BEPHA health insurance scheme. \nRecommendations: This study thus recommended that, the scheme should reduce the waiting period for minor health risk to at most 2 weeks while the 6 months waiting period for major health risk including delivery should be reduced to one (01) month to increase finances from large enrolment. It also recommended the sensitization of health personnel on good customer service principles to increase service quality at these partner health facilities.","PeriodicalId":224837,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47672/ejhs.1223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Inadequate financial support and provision of poor-quality health services among the health facilities are major causes behind poor performance of Community Health Financing (CHF). The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of adequate funding and health service provision on micro health insurance growth, taking BEPHA as a case study. Methodology: The descriptive and explanatory research designs were used in this study. Data was collected by administering questionnaires to 400 respondents. Interviews were also carried out on 10 staff of BEPHA. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation, and multiple regression analysis. Findings: In results regarding BEPHA financing, 70% of those interviewed believed it is high while 30% indicated that it is low. Out of 400 participants 191 (47.8%) of them perceived services offered by BEPHA partner hospitals as fair while 182 (45.5%) perceived their services as good. The correlation results showed a strong positive and significant relationship between sufficiency of BEPHA financing (r= 0.802, p < 0.05) and quality of BEPHA health services (r = 0.667, p < 0.05) with the growth of BEPHA as a health insurance scheme. The multiple regression analysis results showed that sufficiency of BEPHA financing (β=0.166; p < 0.1), has a positive and significant effect on growth of BEPHA. The quality of BEPHA health services (β=0.200; p < 0.1) also has a significant positive effect on growth of BEPHA. Concisely, the study revealed that the funding and quality of BEPHA health services can determine the variations in the growth of BEPHA health insurance scheme. Recommendations: This study thus recommended that, the scheme should reduce the waiting period for minor health risk to at most 2 weeks while the 6 months waiting period for major health risk including delivery should be reduced to one (01) month to increase finances from large enrolment. It also recommended the sensitization of health personnel on good customer service principles to increase service quality at these partner health facilities.
充足的资金和卫生服务提供对微医疗保险增长的影响:喀麦隆西北地区BEPHA的案例
目的:财政支持不足和卫生设施提供的卫生服务质量差是社区卫生融资业绩不佳的主要原因。本研究的目的是探讨充足的资金和卫生服务提供对微健康保险增长的影响,并以BEPHA为例进行研究。方法:本研究采用描述性和解释性研究设计。数据是通过对400名受访者进行问卷调查收集的。此外,还对BEPHA的10名工作人员进行了访谈。数据分析采用描述性统计、相关分析和多元回归分析。调查结果:在关于BEPHA融资的结果中,70%的受访者认为高,30%的受访者认为低。在400名参与者中,191名(47.8%)认为BEPHA合作医院提供的服务公平,182名(45.5%)认为服务良好。相关结果显示,BEPHA融资充分性(r= 0.802, p < 0.05)与BEPHA卫生服务质量(r= 0.667, p < 0.05)与BEPHA作为健康保险方案的发展呈显著正相关关系。多元回归分析结果显示,BEPHA融资充分性(β=0.166;p < 0.1),对BEPHA的生长有显著的正向影响。BEPHA卫生服务质量(β=0.200;p < 0.1)对BEPHA的生长也有显著的正向影响。简而言之,研究表明,BEPHA医疗服务的资金和质量可以决定BEPHA医疗保险计划增长的变化。建议:因此,本研究建议,该计划应将次要健康风险的等待期减少到最多2周,而将包括分娩在内的重大健康风险的6个月等待期减少到1(01)个月,以增加大量报名的资金。它还建议提高保健人员对良好客户服务原则的认识,以提高这些伙伴保健设施的服务质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信