Fintech in Financial Inclusion: Machine Learning Applications in Assessing Credit Risk

Majid Bazarbash
{"title":"Fintech in Financial Inclusion: Machine Learning Applications in Assessing Credit Risk","authors":"Majid Bazarbash","doi":"10.5089/9781498314428.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent advances in digital technology and big data have allowed FinTech (financial technology) lending to emerge as a potentially promising solution to reduce the cost of credit and increase financial inclusion. However, machine learning (ML) methods that lie at the heart of FinTech credit have remained largely a black box for the nontechnical audience. This paper contributes to the literature by discussing potential strengths and weaknesses of ML-based credit assessment through (1) presenting core ideas and the most common techniques in ML for the nontechnical audience; and (2) discussing the fundamental challenges in credit risk analysis. FinTech credit has the potential to enhance financial inclusion and outperform traditional credit scoring by (1) leveraging nontraditional data sources to improve the assessment of the borrower’s track record; (2) appraising collateral value; (3) forecasting income prospects; and (4) predicting changes in general conditions. However, because of the central role of data in ML-based analysis, data relevance should be ensured, especially in situations when a deep structural change occurs, when borrowers could counterfeit certain indicators, and when agency problems arising from information asymmetry could not be resolved. To avoid digital financial exclusion and redlining, variables that trigger discrimination should not be used to assess credit rating.","PeriodicalId":340287,"journal":{"name":"FinPlanRN: Other Finance Planning Fundamentals (Topic)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"58","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FinPlanRN: Other Finance Planning Fundamentals (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498314428.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

Abstract

Recent advances in digital technology and big data have allowed FinTech (financial technology) lending to emerge as a potentially promising solution to reduce the cost of credit and increase financial inclusion. However, machine learning (ML) methods that lie at the heart of FinTech credit have remained largely a black box for the nontechnical audience. This paper contributes to the literature by discussing potential strengths and weaknesses of ML-based credit assessment through (1) presenting core ideas and the most common techniques in ML for the nontechnical audience; and (2) discussing the fundamental challenges in credit risk analysis. FinTech credit has the potential to enhance financial inclusion and outperform traditional credit scoring by (1) leveraging nontraditional data sources to improve the assessment of the borrower’s track record; (2) appraising collateral value; (3) forecasting income prospects; and (4) predicting changes in general conditions. However, because of the central role of data in ML-based analysis, data relevance should be ensured, especially in situations when a deep structural change occurs, when borrowers could counterfeit certain indicators, and when agency problems arising from information asymmetry could not be resolved. To avoid digital financial exclusion and redlining, variables that trigger discrimination should not be used to assess credit rating.
普惠金融中的金融科技:机器学习在信用风险评估中的应用
数字技术和大数据的最新进展使金融科技(FinTech)贷款成为降低信贷成本和增加金融包容性的潜在解决方案。然而,作为金融科技信贷核心的机器学习(ML)方法在很大程度上仍然是非技术观众的黑盒子。本文通过讨论基于ML的信用评估的潜在优势和劣势,为文献做出了贡献(1)为非技术观众呈现ML的核心思想和最常见的技术;(2)讨论了信用风险分析面临的基本挑战。金融科技信贷有潜力增强金融普惠性,并通过以下方式优于传统信用评分:(1)利用非传统数据源改进对借款人业绩记录的评估;(二)评估抵押品价值;(3)预测收入前景;(4)预测一般情况的变化。然而,由于数据在基于ml的分析中的核心作用,应确保数据的相关性,特别是在发生深层结构变化、借款人可能伪造某些指标以及信息不对称引起的代理问题无法解决的情况下。为了避免数字金融排斥和划红线,不应该使用引发歧视的变量来评估信用评级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信