Eye-tracking based quantification of the safety of human-machine interfaces of complementary protective system functions

Julian Zehetner, I. Häring, U. Weber, W. Riedel
{"title":"Eye-tracking based quantification of the safety of human-machine interfaces of complementary protective system functions","authors":"Julian Zehetner, I. Häring, U. Weber, W. Riedel","doi":"10.24840/2184-0954_005.002_0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Complementary protective measures are of increasing importance with rising degree of automation. As free robots become part of our daily life in industry, on shop floors and beyond, the overall safety of persons has to be ensured. However, assessing the reliability of complementary safety functions remains a challenge, particularly when humans are in the loop. The paper shows how to use the eye-tracking methodology to gain data for assessing the reliability of the human interaction with machine interfaces for complementary protective measures. The paper first identifies factors relevant for eye-tracking, then selects related eye tracking test parameters and finally provides a systematic procedure to assess both, in particular regarding visibility and susceptibility. The methodology is applied and the parameter selection is validated. It is found that in particular the identified and measured parameters fixation count for area of interest (AOI) and the associated average visit duration can be used to assess the factor perceptibility. The parameter deviation of fixation can thereby be used to assess usability. Based on this, a full-scale eye-tracking assessment is proposed for the reliability of the interaction of humans with the machine interfaces of supplementary protective measures. In summary, the preliminary test run execution shows that eye-tracking technology is a promising method for measuring and quantifying the human reliability when interacting with safety-related human-machine interfaces.","PeriodicalId":201704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Safety","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24840/2184-0954_005.002_0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Complementary protective measures are of increasing importance with rising degree of automation. As free robots become part of our daily life in industry, on shop floors and beyond, the overall safety of persons has to be ensured. However, assessing the reliability of complementary safety functions remains a challenge, particularly when humans are in the loop. The paper shows how to use the eye-tracking methodology to gain data for assessing the reliability of the human interaction with machine interfaces for complementary protective measures. The paper first identifies factors relevant for eye-tracking, then selects related eye tracking test parameters and finally provides a systematic procedure to assess both, in particular regarding visibility and susceptibility. The methodology is applied and the parameter selection is validated. It is found that in particular the identified and measured parameters fixation count for area of interest (AOI) and the associated average visit duration can be used to assess the factor perceptibility. The parameter deviation of fixation can thereby be used to assess usability. Based on this, a full-scale eye-tracking assessment is proposed for the reliability of the interaction of humans with the machine interfaces of supplementary protective measures. In summary, the preliminary test run execution shows that eye-tracking technology is a promising method for measuring and quantifying the human reliability when interacting with safety-related human-machine interfaces.
基于眼动追踪的互补防护系统功能人机界面安全性量化
随着自动化程度的提高,补充保护措施也越来越重要。随着自由机器人成为我们日常生活的一部分,在工业、车间和其他领域,必须确保人的整体安全。然而,评估补充安全功能的可靠性仍然是一个挑战,特别是当人类参与其中时。本文展示了如何使用眼动追踪方法来获取数据,以评估人机交互的可靠性,以采取补充保护措施。本文首先确定了眼动追踪的相关因素,然后选择了相关的眼动追踪测试参数,最后给出了一个系统的程序来评估两者,特别是可见度和敏感性。应用了该方法,并对参数选择进行了验证。研究发现,通过对感兴趣区域(AOI)的确定和测量参数固定计数以及相关的平均访问时间可以评估因子的可感知性。因此,固定的参数偏差可以用来评估可用性。在此基础上,提出了人与辅助防护措施的机器界面交互可靠性的全尺度眼动追踪评估。总之,初步的测试运行执行表明,眼动追踪技术在与安全相关的人机界面交互时是一种很有前途的测量和量化人类可靠性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信