Urgensi Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Bagi Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana

Mercy Pratiwi Patty, D. Hehanussa, H. Z. Wadjo
{"title":"Urgensi Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Bagi Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana","authors":"Mercy Pratiwi Patty, D. Hehanussa, H. Z. Wadjo","doi":"10.47268/pela.v1i2.6392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Reality shows that crimes are not only committed by adults, but also by children. Children who commit crimes must be held accountable for their actions that violate the law. \nPurposes of the Research: In order to analyze the juvenile offender, the law enforcement and sentencing process applied to the child is carried out specifically by prioritizing the best interests of the child. \nMethods of the Research: Type of research: Juridical Empirical, Data Sources include primary data and secondary data. Techniques for reviewing and collecting primary and secondary data are using literature studies and interview results. Data analysis used in legal research is qualitative analysis. \nResults Originality Findings of the Research: Based on the results of the study, it was found that the urgency of a community research report in imposing sanctions on children who commit criminal acts is an important matter. Community research reports that are made basically have an influence on the judge's decision in juvenile court. With the availability of community research reports, it can be used as consideration for judges in making their decisions as regulated in Article 60 Paragraph (3) of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. Furthermore, if the judge does not consider the community research report from the Community Counselor, the legal consequences arising from the decision on the child who commits the crime are null and void, as referred to in Article 60 Paragraph (4) of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System.","PeriodicalId":251089,"journal":{"name":"PATTIMURA Legal Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PATTIMURA Legal Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i2.6392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Reality shows that crimes are not only committed by adults, but also by children. Children who commit crimes must be held accountable for their actions that violate the law. Purposes of the Research: In order to analyze the juvenile offender, the law enforcement and sentencing process applied to the child is carried out specifically by prioritizing the best interests of the child. Methods of the Research: Type of research: Juridical Empirical, Data Sources include primary data and secondary data. Techniques for reviewing and collecting primary and secondary data are using literature studies and interview results. Data analysis used in legal research is qualitative analysis. Results Originality Findings of the Research: Based on the results of the study, it was found that the urgency of a community research report in imposing sanctions on children who commit criminal acts is an important matter. Community research reports that are made basically have an influence on the judge's decision in juvenile court. With the availability of community research reports, it can be used as consideration for judges in making their decisions as regulated in Article 60 Paragraph (3) of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. Furthermore, if the judge does not consider the community research report from the Community Counselor, the legal consequences arising from the decision on the child who commits the crime are null and void, as referred to in Article 60 Paragraph (4) of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System.
社区研究报告的当务之急是对罪犯的儿子进行刑事判决
现实表明,犯罪的不仅是成年人,而且还有儿童。犯罪的儿童必须对他们的违法行为负责。研究目的:为了分析少年犯,适用于儿童的执法和量刑过程以儿童的最大利益为优先顺序进行。研究方法:研究类型:司法实证,数据来源包括一手数据和二手数据。回顾和收集一手和二手数据的技术是使用文献研究和访谈结果。在法律研究中使用的数据分析是定性分析。研究的独创性发现:根据研究结果,发现社区研究报告对实施犯罪行为的儿童实施制裁的紧迫性是一件重要的事情。在青少年法庭上,社区研究报告对法官的判决具有重要的影响。有了社区研究报告,根据2012年关于少年刑事司法制度的第11号法律第60条第3款的规定,可以将其作为法官作出决定的考虑因素。此外,如果法官不考虑社区顾问的社区研究报告,则根据2012年关于少年刑事司法制度的第11号法律第60条第4款的规定,对犯罪儿童作出的决定所产生的法律后果是无效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信