Give Me Liberty: Liberty of Opinion in the Presbyterian Church of Australia

Jared Hood
{"title":"Give Me Liberty: Liberty of Opinion in the Presbyterian Church of Australia","authors":"Jared Hood","doi":"10.53521/a228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Presbyterian Church of Australia adopted the Westminster Confession as its subordinate standard, but the Confession 'read in the light of the following declaratory statement'. This grants some degree of latitude to PCA leaders, who have to subscribe to the Confession. However, what is the extent of this freedom? This has caused considerable discussion and disagreement. Studies to date have focused on the clause's historical context. There is more that can be said on that - indeed, a fresh perspective will be offered. However, rather than just reading an interpretation of history into the clause, the clause itself needs to be read in its own right. Its own voice needs to be heard, particularly since it is the words themselves that are the law of the Church, not the historical context. Its semantics and syntax need to be analysed. An exegetical study is required.","PeriodicalId":188810,"journal":{"name":"Reformed Theological Review","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reformed Theological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53521/a228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Presbyterian Church of Australia adopted the Westminster Confession as its subordinate standard, but the Confession 'read in the light of the following declaratory statement'. This grants some degree of latitude to PCA leaders, who have to subscribe to the Confession. However, what is the extent of this freedom? This has caused considerable discussion and disagreement. Studies to date have focused on the clause's historical context. There is more that can be said on that - indeed, a fresh perspective will be offered. However, rather than just reading an interpretation of history into the clause, the clause itself needs to be read in its own right. Its own voice needs to be heard, particularly since it is the words themselves that are the law of the Church, not the historical context. Its semantics and syntax need to be analysed. An exegetical study is required.
《给我自由:澳大利亚长老会的言论自由》
澳大利亚长老会采用威斯敏斯特信条作为其从属标准,但信条“根据以下宣示性声明来解读”。这给了长老会领导人一定程度的自由,他们必须签署这份信条。然而,这种自由的程度是什么?这引起了相当大的讨论和分歧。迄今为止的研究主要集中在该条款的历史背景上。关于这一点还有更多可说的——事实上,将提供一个新的视角。然而,不能仅仅把对历史的解释解读到条款中,条款本身需要被理解。它自己的声音需要被听到,特别是因为它的话语本身是教会的法律,而不是历史背景。它的语义和语法需要分析。需要进行训诂学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信