Comparative Analysis of Calculation of Income Tax Article 21 and Zakat

Tutut Adiningsih, Ronan Roby Cahyandi
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Calculation of Income Tax Article 21 and Zakat","authors":"Tutut Adiningsih, Ronan Roby Cahyandi","doi":"10.21111/al-iktisab.v3i2.3911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to examine the comparison of Article 21 Income Tax calculations using the gross method, the net method, and the gross-up method to find out which method is most profitable for company profits. This study uses similar comparisons that were made for the calculation of zakat, which also used 2 (two) methods, namely the net and gross methods. Data on employee salaries used in this study are secondary data obtained from PT. Sinar Abadi Pratama Sejahtera in 2018. The analytical method used in this study is a descriptive analysis with a qualitative approach. The findings in this study are to show that of the three methods of calculating Article 21 Income Tax, the most significant profit is the gross-up method. As for the calculation of zakat, which is beneficial for zakat payers is to use the net method. Calculation of Income Tax Article 21 gross-up method, produces the smallest corporate income tax while still meeting the tax requirements. Employees enjoy the benefits of receiving income tax benefits so that they can receive a full salary. On the net zakat calculation method, the zakat calculation is smaller than if using the gross method.","PeriodicalId":188875,"journal":{"name":"Al-Iktisab: Journal of Islamic Economic Law","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Iktisab: Journal of Islamic Economic Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21111/al-iktisab.v3i2.3911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the comparison of Article 21 Income Tax calculations using the gross method, the net method, and the gross-up method to find out which method is most profitable for company profits. This study uses similar comparisons that were made for the calculation of zakat, which also used 2 (two) methods, namely the net and gross methods. Data on employee salaries used in this study are secondary data obtained from PT. Sinar Abadi Pratama Sejahtera in 2018. The analytical method used in this study is a descriptive analysis with a qualitative approach. The findings in this study are to show that of the three methods of calculating Article 21 Income Tax, the most significant profit is the gross-up method. As for the calculation of zakat, which is beneficial for zakat payers is to use the net method. Calculation of Income Tax Article 21 gross-up method, produces the smallest corporate income tax while still meeting the tax requirements. Employees enjoy the benefits of receiving income tax benefits so that they can receive a full salary. On the net zakat calculation method, the zakat calculation is smaller than if using the gross method.
所得税第21条与天课计算的比较分析
本文的目的是研究使用毛额法、净额法和毛额法计算第21条所得税的比较,以找出哪种方法对公司利润最有利。这项研究使用了计算天课的类似比较,也使用了两种方法,即净额法和毛额法。本研究中使用的员工工资数据是2018年从PT. Sinar Abadi Pratama Sejahtera获得的二次数据。本研究使用的分析方法是定性方法的描述性分析。本文的研究结果表明,在计算第二十一条所得税的三种方法中,利润最显著的是毛额法。对于天课的计算,采用净法是有利于天课缴纳者的。第二十一条企业所得税的计算采用合计法,在满足纳税要求的前提下,产生最小的企业所得税。员工享受所得税优惠,这样他们就可以获得全额工资。在净天课计算法中,天课的计算量比使用毛法时要小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信