The Shame of Planners

M. M. Berger
{"title":"The Shame of Planners","authors":"M. M. Berger","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2002.10394767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract It has been more than two decades since the late Supreme Court Justice William Brennan challenged the planning profession with his famous query: “If a policeman must know the Constitution, then why not a planner?” (San Diego Gas & Elec. Co. v. City of San Diego, 450 U.S. 621, 661, n. 26 [1981].) It's not that Justice Brennan was unsympathetic to the goals and tribulations of land-use planners. After all, his constitutional gauntlet was thrown down shortly after he had authored the Court's opinion in Penn Central (undoubtedly lauded in some of the other commentaries in this issue, as it was by the Tahoe-Sierra majority) upholding New York City's Landmarks Preservation Law.","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2002.10394767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract It has been more than two decades since the late Supreme Court Justice William Brennan challenged the planning profession with his famous query: “If a policeman must know the Constitution, then why not a planner?” (San Diego Gas & Elec. Co. v. City of San Diego, 450 U.S. 621, 661, n. 26 [1981].) It's not that Justice Brennan was unsympathetic to the goals and tribulations of land-use planners. After all, his constitutional gauntlet was thrown down shortly after he had authored the Court's opinion in Penn Central (undoubtedly lauded in some of the other commentaries in this issue, as it was by the Tahoe-Sierra majority) upholding New York City's Landmarks Preservation Law.
规划师的耻辱
二十多年前,美国最高法院(Supreme Court)已故大法官威廉•布伦南(William Brennan)提出了一个著名的质疑:“如果警察必须了解宪法,那么规划师为什么就不了解呢?”(圣地亚哥燃气和电力公司诉圣地亚哥市,450 U.S. 621, 661, n. 26[1981]。)这并不是说布伦南法官不同情土地使用规划者的目标和苦难。毕竟,他的宪法挑战是在他撰写宾夕法尼亚中央法院的意见后不久被推翻的(毫无疑问,在这个问题上的其他一些评论中受到赞扬,就像塔霍-塞拉多数人一样),支持纽约市的地标保护法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信