Science or “Sad Trash”? Aristotelian Lineages in the Historiography of Animal Magnetism

Cecilia Muratori
{"title":"Science or “Sad Trash”? Aristotelian Lineages in the Historiography of Animal Magnetism","authors":"Cecilia Muratori","doi":"10.1484/m.adarg-eb.5.117618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I will highlight how different lineages are sketched in order to position animal magnetism in terms of philosophical tradition. This, in turn, is often employed as a strategy to interpret animal magnetism, whether sceptically or sympathetically. Furthermore, this philosophical framing serves the purpose of assessing the innovation of animal magnetism (or lack thereof) compared to the natural philosophy of the past. Therefore it was used both in literature that was favour-able towards animal magnetism, and in works that expressed more sceptical positions. A series of specific historiographical questions emerges: whether animal magnetism was to be considered as rooted more in Aristotelianism or in Platonism; in either case, which medieval and Renaissance authors transmitted ancient ideas that found their way into the theory of animal magnetism (and it is not by chance that some overlap with Victor Frankenstein’s items of reading); and finally how such philosophical backgrounds inflected the understanding of the ‘new’ theory and of its value.","PeriodicalId":350873,"journal":{"name":"The Territories of Philosophy in Modern Historiography","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Territories of Philosophy in Modern Historiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1484/m.adarg-eb.5.117618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I will highlight how different lineages are sketched in order to position animal magnetism in terms of philosophical tradition. This, in turn, is often employed as a strategy to interpret animal magnetism, whether sceptically or sympathetically. Furthermore, this philosophical framing serves the purpose of assessing the innovation of animal magnetism (or lack thereof) compared to the natural philosophy of the past. Therefore it was used both in literature that was favour-able towards animal magnetism, and in works that expressed more sceptical positions. A series of specific historiographical questions emerges: whether animal magnetism was to be considered as rooted more in Aristotelianism or in Platonism; in either case, which medieval and Renaissance authors transmitted ancient ideas that found their way into the theory of animal magnetism (and it is not by chance that some overlap with Victor Frankenstein’s items of reading); and finally how such philosophical backgrounds inflected the understanding of the ‘new’ theory and of its value.
科学还是“可悲的垃圾”?动物磁学史学中的亚里士多德谱系
我将强调如何描绘不同的谱系,以便在哲学传统方面定位动物磁力。反过来,这通常被用来作为一种策略来解释动物磁力,无论是怀疑还是同情。此外,与过去的自然哲学相比,这种哲学框架有助于评估动物磁学的创新(或缺乏创新)。因此,它既用于支持动物磁力的文学作品,也用于表达更怀疑立场的作品。一系列具体的史学问题出现了:动物磁力学应该被认为更多地植根于亚里士多德主义还是柏拉图主义;在这两种情况下,中世纪和文艺复兴时期的作家将古代思想传播到动物磁力理论中(其中一些与维克多·弗兰肯斯坦的阅读内容重叠并非偶然);最后,这些哲学背景如何影响了对“新”理论及其价值的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信