Enhancing Designer Knowledge to Dialogue Management: A Comparison between Supervised and Reinforcement Learning Approaches

B. Nishimoto, Rogers Cristo, Alex F. Mansano, Eduardo R. Hruschka, Vinicius Fernandes Caridá, Anna Helena Reali Costa
{"title":"Enhancing Designer Knowledge to Dialogue Management: A Comparison between Supervised and Reinforcement Learning Approaches","authors":"B. Nishimoto, Rogers Cristo, Alex F. Mansano, Eduardo R. Hruschka, Vinicius Fernandes Caridá, Anna Helena Reali Costa","doi":"10.5753/eniac.2022.227625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Task-oriented dialogue systems are complex natural language applications employed in various fields such as health care, sales assistance, and digital customer servicing. Although the literature suggests several approaches to managing this type of dialogue system, only a few of them compares the performance of different techniques. From this perspective, in this paper we present a comparison between supervised learning, using the transformer architecture, and reinforcement learning using two flavors of Deep Q-Learning (DQN) algorithms. Our experiments use the MultiWOZ dataset and a real-world digital customer service dataset, from which we show that integrating expert pre-defined rules with DQN allows outperforming supervised approaches. Additionally, we also propose a method to make better usage of the designer knowledge by improving how interactions collected in warm-up are used in training phase. Our results indicate a reduction in training time by preserving the designer’s knowledge, expressed as pre-defined rules in memory during the initial steps of the DQN training procedure.","PeriodicalId":165095,"journal":{"name":"Anais do XIX Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC 2022)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais do XIX Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC 2022)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5753/eniac.2022.227625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Task-oriented dialogue systems are complex natural language applications employed in various fields such as health care, sales assistance, and digital customer servicing. Although the literature suggests several approaches to managing this type of dialogue system, only a few of them compares the performance of different techniques. From this perspective, in this paper we present a comparison between supervised learning, using the transformer architecture, and reinforcement learning using two flavors of Deep Q-Learning (DQN) algorithms. Our experiments use the MultiWOZ dataset and a real-world digital customer service dataset, from which we show that integrating expert pre-defined rules with DQN allows outperforming supervised approaches. Additionally, we also propose a method to make better usage of the designer knowledge by improving how interactions collected in warm-up are used in training phase. Our results indicate a reduction in training time by preserving the designer’s knowledge, expressed as pre-defined rules in memory during the initial steps of the DQN training procedure.
提高设计者的对话管理知识:监督学习和强化学习方法的比较
面向任务的对话系统是复杂的自然语言应用程序,应用于各种领域,如医疗保健、销售协助和数字客户服务。尽管文献提出了几种管理这类对话系统的方法,但其中只有少数几种方法比较了不同技术的表现。从这个角度来看,在本文中,我们比较了使用变压器架构的监督学习和使用两种深度q -学习(DQN)算法的强化学习。我们的实验使用了MultiWOZ数据集和一个真实世界的数字客户服务数据集,从中我们发现,将专家预定义的规则与DQN集成可以胜过监督方法。此外,我们还提出了一种方法,通过改进在热身阶段收集的交互如何在训练阶段使用来更好地利用设计师知识。我们的结果表明,在DQN训练过程的初始步骤中,通过保留设计师的知识,以内存中的预定义规则表示,可以减少训练时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信