RapidRead: step-at-a-glance crisis checklists

Jesse Cirimele, Leslie Wu, Kristen Leach, S. Card, K. Harrison, Larry Chu, Scott R. Klemmer
{"title":"RapidRead: step-at-a-glance crisis checklists","authors":"Jesse Cirimele, Leslie Wu, Kristen Leach, S. Card, K. Harrison, Larry Chu, Scott R. Klemmer","doi":"10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2014.254954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Complex, perilous domains like surgery and aviation require accurate responses under extreme time constraints. Checklists improve important outcomes in these domains. However, current designs are based largely on intuition; there is little theory or empirical work about designing effective procedure aids. Furthermore, discretionary checklist use is fragmented and bursty rather than predictable and continuous. Working with doctors and studying successful aids, we developed the RapidRead design approach. It distills three patterns for designing rapidly readable aids: Dynamic Focus, Object-Action, and Information Patches. Two experiments compared medical professionals' search time, eye-gaze, and retention with alternative checklist designs. Applying RapidRead patterns resulted in significantly faster aid usage, reducing answer time and importantly minimizing the frequency of slow responses to medical queries.","PeriodicalId":120856,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2014.254954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Complex, perilous domains like surgery and aviation require accurate responses under extreme time constraints. Checklists improve important outcomes in these domains. However, current designs are based largely on intuition; there is little theory or empirical work about designing effective procedure aids. Furthermore, discretionary checklist use is fragmented and bursty rather than predictable and continuous. Working with doctors and studying successful aids, we developed the RapidRead design approach. It distills three patterns for designing rapidly readable aids: Dynamic Focus, Object-Action, and Information Patches. Two experiments compared medical professionals' search time, eye-gaze, and retention with alternative checklist designs. Applying RapidRead patterns resulted in significantly faster aid usage, reducing answer time and importantly minimizing the frequency of slow responses to medical queries.
RapidRead:一步一步的危机清单
外科手术和航空等复杂、危险的领域需要在极端的时间限制下做出准确的反应。清单可以改善这些领域的重要结果。然而,目前的设计很大程度上是基于直觉;关于设计有效的手术辅助工具的理论和实证工作很少。此外,随意使用检查表是碎片化和突发性的,而不是可预测和连续的。通过与医生合作,研究成功的辅助工具,我们开发了RapidRead设计方法。它提炼出三种设计快速可读辅助工具的模式:动态焦点、对象-动作和信息补丁。两个实验比较了医疗专业人员的搜索时间,目光和保留与替代清单设计。应用RapidRead模式大大加快了辅助使用速度,减少了应答时间,重要的是最大限度地减少了对医疗查询的慢响应频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信