Student response to teacher performance: A review based on teacher's mathematics anxiety level

K. Pantaleon, M. Payong, A. Ramda, G. Ningsi
{"title":"Student response to teacher performance: A review based on teacher's mathematics anxiety level","authors":"K. Pantaleon, M. Payong, A. Ramda, G. Ningsi","doi":"10.33654/math.v8i2.1645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to reveal the theoretical relationship between teacher mathematics anxiety and student responses to teacher performance in the learning process. This study involved two prospective mathematics teachers, which are HA and LA. HA has a prominent level of math anxiety, while LA has a low level of math anxiety. In addition, this study also involved sixty-four students who assessed the performance of HA and LA. The instruments used are questionnaires, tests, assignments, observations, and interviews. The data analysis technique used is descriptive analysis and chi-square test. The results of the descriptive analysis showed that 97% of students gave a positive response to the performance of LA, and only 76% of students gave a positive response to the performance of HA. In addition, the results of the analysis showed that the value of  = 45.86 > the critical value of   =3.84, which means that there is a significant difference in student responses to the performance of the two teachers. Based on the results of this analysis, it was concluded that students responded better to teachers with lower levels of math anxiety.","PeriodicalId":376956,"journal":{"name":"Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v8i2.1645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the theoretical relationship between teacher mathematics anxiety and student responses to teacher performance in the learning process. This study involved two prospective mathematics teachers, which are HA and LA. HA has a prominent level of math anxiety, while LA has a low level of math anxiety. In addition, this study also involved sixty-four students who assessed the performance of HA and LA. The instruments used are questionnaires, tests, assignments, observations, and interviews. The data analysis technique used is descriptive analysis and chi-square test. The results of the descriptive analysis showed that 97% of students gave a positive response to the performance of LA, and only 76% of students gave a positive response to the performance of HA. In addition, the results of the analysis showed that the value of  = 45.86 > the critical value of   =3.84, which means that there is a significant difference in student responses to the performance of the two teachers. Based on the results of this analysis, it was concluded that students responded better to teachers with lower levels of math anxiety.
学生对教师表现的反应:基于教师数学焦虑水平的考察
本研究旨在揭示教师数学焦虑与学生在学习过程中对教师表现的反应之间的理论关系。本研究涉及两位准数学教师,分别是HA和LA。HA的数学焦虑水平显著,而LA的数学焦虑水平较低。此外,本研究还涉及64名学生,他们评估了HA和LA的表现。使用的工具有问卷调查、测试、作业、观察和访谈。使用的数据分析技术是描述性分析和卡方检验。描述性分析的结果显示,97%的学生对LA的表现给出了积极的反应,而只有76%的学生对HA的表现给出了积极的反应。此外,分析结果显示,临界值= 45.86 >临界值=3.84,这意味着学生对两位教师的表现的反应存在显著差异。根据这一分析的结果,得出的结论是,学生对数学焦虑水平较低的老师反应更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信