{"title":"Comparisons of adaptive threshold control algorithms for unslotted common-spreading-code packet-radio networks","authors":"Ikchan Kim, R. Scholtz","doi":"10.1109/MILCOM.1992.244129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors describe adaptive threshold control algorithms for the detection of a header in an unslotted centralized packet radio system with common direct-sequence spread-spectrum modulation. Two threshold control strategies, namely, the fixed-maximum-delay (FMD) strategy and the fixed-sample-size (FSS) strategy, are analyzed for two distinct types of false-alarm events, namely, false-alarm on multiple access noise and false-alarm on a header prefix. These strategies are based on an estimate of the total noise power in the receiver. The FSS strategy achieves constant false-alarm rate on sidelobes without prior knowledge of the number of active transmitting radios. The FMD strategy achieves nearly constant false-alarm rate on sidelobes with derived knowledge of the average number of active transmitting radios. Both strategies reduce the dynamic range of the false-alarm rate on a header prefix considerably.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":394587,"journal":{"name":"MILCOM 92 Conference Record","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MILCOM 92 Conference Record","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.1992.244129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The authors describe adaptive threshold control algorithms for the detection of a header in an unslotted centralized packet radio system with common direct-sequence spread-spectrum modulation. Two threshold control strategies, namely, the fixed-maximum-delay (FMD) strategy and the fixed-sample-size (FSS) strategy, are analyzed for two distinct types of false-alarm events, namely, false-alarm on multiple access noise and false-alarm on a header prefix. These strategies are based on an estimate of the total noise power in the receiver. The FSS strategy achieves constant false-alarm rate on sidelobes without prior knowledge of the number of active transmitting radios. The FMD strategy achieves nearly constant false-alarm rate on sidelobes with derived knowledge of the average number of active transmitting radios. Both strategies reduce the dynamic range of the false-alarm rate on a header prefix considerably.<>