Optimizing a Complex, Uneven and Low-Resolution Reservoir While Using Dynamic Dataset for Structure Definition

Sheraz Ahmed, G. Waqas, Hafiz Mustafa Ud Din Sheikh, Saad bin Abrar, Majid Siddiqui
{"title":"Optimizing a Complex, Uneven and Low-Resolution Reservoir While Using Dynamic Dataset for Structure Definition","authors":"Sheraz Ahmed, G. Waqas, Hafiz Mustafa Ud Din Sheikh, Saad bin Abrar, Majid Siddiqui","doi":"10.2118/214000-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n It is well established that the oil & gas industry has long surpassed its plateau for large discoveries. Thus, many companies have shifted their focus to cost-constrained policies for hydrocarbon discovery, making it difficult to have a strong sub-surface definition. Add the structural uncertainties and complexities of new discoveries in this scenario, the optimized field development becomes a real challenge. This study presents the development strategy established for a reservoir, with low seismic resolution, using the integrated dynamic data to define the reservoir structure and optimize its recovery.\n This paper focuses on a relatively new discovered formation in one of the oldest gas giants in Pakistan. The productive sandstone units are in beds with thicknesses ranging from 10-50m, separated by mudstone intervals. The low seismic resolution has posed a major challenge in finding the sweet spots for hydrocarbons above Gas-Water-Contact (GWC)-resulting in 60% well failures. Therefore, a workflow was developed to analyze various dynamic datasets in conjunction with the re-interpretation of seismic to delineate the reservoir structure. This included re-interpretation of MDT data and formation gradients, core re-evaluation, critical analysis of reservoir pressure variation, well failure analysis, thickness maps and PVT properties.\n The first four wells drilled in this reservoir had two successes, both in the Western compartment. However, sudden water production loaded up these wells only after 123 BCF production, which was a lower recovery as compared to GIIP estimates. After further geological evaluation and 3D seismic re-acquisition, more wells were drilled – revealing another deposition with a different GWC, but only 1 well was successfully completed as a producer, adding around 38% more reserve, while the others were again unsuccessful due to high structural uncertainty. This led to the development of a detailed algorithm for integrating dynamic data set with seismic re-interpretation and thickness mapping with the help of which two more wells were drilled and added around 22 % more reserves to the current mix. The dynamic data of these wells have now been further evaluated which revealed that the two compartments are in fact in communication with each other despite having a 60m difference in their GWCs. Finally, two more wells are now planned which will add around 10-20 % more recoverable volumes, giving an overall EUR of ~80% from these compartments.\n The main achievement of this workflow is a robust algorithm to integrate the dynamic data with geological interpretation to delineate a low-resolution reservoir since the seismic interpretation cannot be solely relied upon for developing such reservoirs. The paper also illustrates the robust engineering models and data analyses in a more systematic manner to ensure optimum locations for future wells to access, the otherwise, undrained locations.","PeriodicalId":286390,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, March 13, 2023","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, March 13, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/214000-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is well established that the oil & gas industry has long surpassed its plateau for large discoveries. Thus, many companies have shifted their focus to cost-constrained policies for hydrocarbon discovery, making it difficult to have a strong sub-surface definition. Add the structural uncertainties and complexities of new discoveries in this scenario, the optimized field development becomes a real challenge. This study presents the development strategy established for a reservoir, with low seismic resolution, using the integrated dynamic data to define the reservoir structure and optimize its recovery. This paper focuses on a relatively new discovered formation in one of the oldest gas giants in Pakistan. The productive sandstone units are in beds with thicknesses ranging from 10-50m, separated by mudstone intervals. The low seismic resolution has posed a major challenge in finding the sweet spots for hydrocarbons above Gas-Water-Contact (GWC)-resulting in 60% well failures. Therefore, a workflow was developed to analyze various dynamic datasets in conjunction with the re-interpretation of seismic to delineate the reservoir structure. This included re-interpretation of MDT data and formation gradients, core re-evaluation, critical analysis of reservoir pressure variation, well failure analysis, thickness maps and PVT properties. The first four wells drilled in this reservoir had two successes, both in the Western compartment. However, sudden water production loaded up these wells only after 123 BCF production, which was a lower recovery as compared to GIIP estimates. After further geological evaluation and 3D seismic re-acquisition, more wells were drilled – revealing another deposition with a different GWC, but only 1 well was successfully completed as a producer, adding around 38% more reserve, while the others were again unsuccessful due to high structural uncertainty. This led to the development of a detailed algorithm for integrating dynamic data set with seismic re-interpretation and thickness mapping with the help of which two more wells were drilled and added around 22 % more reserves to the current mix. The dynamic data of these wells have now been further evaluated which revealed that the two compartments are in fact in communication with each other despite having a 60m difference in their GWCs. Finally, two more wells are now planned which will add around 10-20 % more recoverable volumes, giving an overall EUR of ~80% from these compartments. The main achievement of this workflow is a robust algorithm to integrate the dynamic data with geological interpretation to delineate a low-resolution reservoir since the seismic interpretation cannot be solely relied upon for developing such reservoirs. The paper also illustrates the robust engineering models and data analyses in a more systematic manner to ensure optimum locations for future wells to access, the otherwise, undrained locations.
利用动态数据集对复杂、不均匀、低分辨率油藏进行结构定义优化
众所周知,石油和天然气行业的大发现早已超过了其平台期。因此,许多公司已经将注意力转移到成本限制的油气发现政策上,这使得很难有一个强有力的地下定义。在这种情况下,再加上结构的不确定性和新发现的复杂性,优化油田开发成为一个真正的挑战。针对某低地震分辨率油藏,提出了利用综合动态数据确定储层结构并优化采收率的开发策略。本文的重点是在巴基斯坦最古老的天然气巨头之一中发现的一个相对较新的地层。生产砂岩单元位于厚度为10-50米的层中,由泥岩层段隔开。低地震分辨率给寻找气-水接触面(GWC)以上油气的甜点带来了重大挑战,导致60%的井失败。因此,开发了一套工作流程来分析各种动态数据集,并结合地震资料的重新解释来描绘储层结构。这包括重新解释MDT数据和地层梯度、岩心重新评价、油藏压力变化的关键分析、井失效分析、厚度图和PVT特性。该油藏的前四口井有两口成功,均位于西部储层。然而,这些井在产量达到123立方英尺后才突然产水,与GIIP估计的采收率相比,这一采收率较低。经过进一步的地质评估和三维地震重新采集,钻了更多的井,发现了另一个GWC不同的沉积,但只有1口井作为生产井成功完井,增加了约38%的储量,而其他井由于结构的高度不确定性而再次失败。这导致了一种详细的算法的发展,该算法将动态数据集与地震重新解释和厚度映射相结合,在此帮助下,又钻了两口井,使目前的储量增加了约22%。目前对这些井的动态数据进行了进一步的评估,结果表明,尽管两个隔室的gwc相差60米,但实际上它们是相互通信的。最后,目前计划再开发两口井,这将增加10- 20%的可采储量,使这些区块的总收益达到80%左右。该工作流程的主要成果是一种鲁棒的算法,可以将动态数据与地质解释相结合,以描绘低分辨率储层,因为开发此类储层不能仅仅依赖地震解释。本文还以更系统的方式说明了强大的工程模型和数据分析,以确保未来油井的最佳位置,否则,不排水的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信