PROCEDURAL MEANS OF JUDICIAL PROTECTION OF VIOLATED RIGHTS IN CASES OF PROVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

O. Osipova
{"title":"PROCEDURAL MEANS OF JUDICIAL PROTECTION OF VIOLATED RIGHTS IN CASES OF PROVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES","authors":"O. Osipova","doi":"10.26661/2616-9444-2021-1-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The content of the concepts of judicial protection, procedural means and methods of judicial protection in administrative proceedings, in particular when considering cases for the provision of administrative services, is studied. The author’s definition of the terms “judicial protection”, “means of judicial protection”, “procedural means of judicial protection” and “the method of judicial protection” is offered. Their relations and principles of application of procedural methods of judicial protection are considered, features of realization of judicial protection in cases on rendering of administrative services are allocated, the system and types of ways of judicial protection of the rights of the subject of the address for reception of administrative services are defined, improving the effectiveness of protection of violated rights. The concept of “violated rights of the subject of application for administrative services” as a basis for going to court for their protection, types of violations, interdependence of claims and methods of judicial protection, the factors influencing the choice of optimal and effective method of judicial protection and principles of application of procedural methods of judicial protection are considered. The complex approach of protection is substantiated regarding the full restoration of the violated rights and compensation for material and moral damage caused by illegal actions, inaction or decisions of the subjects of administrative services and bringing to disciplinary responsibility the guilty officials. It is also proposed to use other methods of judicial protection provided by the Law of Ukraine “On Consumer Protection” and the Commercial Code of Ukraine, such as fines and penalties. The author’s definition of the concept of claim and its types, in particular in cases of administrative services, is given. Proposals have been made to improve the norms of the CAS of Ukraine and the Law of Ukraine “On Administrative Services” on the protection of violated rights of subjects of appeal for the provision of administrative services.","PeriodicalId":115320,"journal":{"name":"Herald of Zaporizhzhia National University. Jurisprudence","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of Zaporizhzhia National University. Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26661/2616-9444-2021-1-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The content of the concepts of judicial protection, procedural means and methods of judicial protection in administrative proceedings, in particular when considering cases for the provision of administrative services, is studied. The author’s definition of the terms “judicial protection”, “means of judicial protection”, “procedural means of judicial protection” and “the method of judicial protection” is offered. Their relations and principles of application of procedural methods of judicial protection are considered, features of realization of judicial protection in cases on rendering of administrative services are allocated, the system and types of ways of judicial protection of the rights of the subject of the address for reception of administrative services are defined, improving the effectiveness of protection of violated rights. The concept of “violated rights of the subject of application for administrative services” as a basis for going to court for their protection, types of violations, interdependence of claims and methods of judicial protection, the factors influencing the choice of optimal and effective method of judicial protection and principles of application of procedural methods of judicial protection are considered. The complex approach of protection is substantiated regarding the full restoration of the violated rights and compensation for material and moral damage caused by illegal actions, inaction or decisions of the subjects of administrative services and bringing to disciplinary responsibility the guilty officials. It is also proposed to use other methods of judicial protection provided by the Law of Ukraine “On Consumer Protection” and the Commercial Code of Ukraine, such as fines and penalties. The author’s definition of the concept of claim and its types, in particular in cases of administrative services, is given. Proposals have been made to improve the norms of the CAS of Ukraine and the Law of Ukraine “On Administrative Services” on the protection of violated rights of subjects of appeal for the provision of administrative services.
在提供行政服务的情况下,对被侵犯权利的司法保护的程序性手段
研究了行政诉讼中司法保护的概念、程序手段和方法的内容,特别是在考虑提供行政服务的案件时。对“司法保护”、“司法保护手段”、“司法保护程序手段”和“司法保护方法”等概念进行了界定。分析了二者的关系和司法保护程序方式的适用原则,梳理了行政服务提供案件中司法保护的实现特点,明确了行政服务接收地址主体权利的司法保护方式的制度和类型,提高了被侵犯权利保护的实效性。对“行政服务申请主体权利受侵害”作为法院保护依据的概念、侵权类型、权利要求与司法保护方式的相互依存关系、选择最优有效司法保护方式的影响因素以及司法保护程序方式的适用原则等问题进行了探讨。在充分恢复被侵犯的权利和赔偿因行政服务对象的非法行动、不作为或决定而造成的物质和精神损害以及追究有罪官员的纪律责任方面,采取了复杂的保护办法。还建议使用乌克兰《消费者保护法》和乌克兰《商法典》规定的其他司法保护方法,如罚款和处罚。作者给出了索赔概念及其类型的定义,特别是在行政事务的情况下。已提出建议,以改进乌克兰仲裁法院和乌克兰“行政服务法”关于保护被侵犯的提供行政服务的申诉主体权利的规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信