{"title":"Factors affecting acquisition policies in libraries: A comparative study of Centrally Funded Technical Institutes(CFTI) and Central Universities","authors":"Nirnimesh Pandiya, M. Sinha","doi":"10.5958/0976-2469.2021.00015.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The information life cycle in a libraryinvolvesacquisition as one of the steps which involves acquiringdocuments for the library. Relevant resources are procured for use by the users. The process of library acquisition has witnessed a drastic change in recent times due to factors like digitalization, financial disruptions, various modes of delivery etc. The purpose of the present research is to understand the factors affecting acquisition policies of libraries of central universities and CFTIs. Literature review for the study was done from reputed databases like Emerald, Taylor and Francis and Web of Science and a Prisma model was developed to narrow down the literature review process. NVivo was used to understand the literature gap with TreeMap and Word cloud. A structured closed ended questionnaire having components related to acquisition was sent to library staff in the ranks of librarian, deputy librarian and assistant librarian for primary data collection. Descriptive statistics was applied to understand the demographic data and comprehend the importance of various components of acquisition. A comparative analysis was done with respect to the two types of institutions-centrally funded technical institutions and central universities. The conclusion of the research work is that the library staff of centrally funded technical institutions and central universities have different preferences for the factors affecting acquisition. The library staff of centrally funded technical institutions had the top priority for ‘ease of acquisition’ whereas their counterparts in central universities looked for ‘significance of the resources’ the most.","PeriodicalId":405689,"journal":{"name":"Library Herald","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library Herald","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-2469.2021.00015.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The information life cycle in a libraryinvolvesacquisition as one of the steps which involves acquiringdocuments for the library. Relevant resources are procured for use by the users. The process of library acquisition has witnessed a drastic change in recent times due to factors like digitalization, financial disruptions, various modes of delivery etc. The purpose of the present research is to understand the factors affecting acquisition policies of libraries of central universities and CFTIs. Literature review for the study was done from reputed databases like Emerald, Taylor and Francis and Web of Science and a Prisma model was developed to narrow down the literature review process. NVivo was used to understand the literature gap with TreeMap and Word cloud. A structured closed ended questionnaire having components related to acquisition was sent to library staff in the ranks of librarian, deputy librarian and assistant librarian for primary data collection. Descriptive statistics was applied to understand the demographic data and comprehend the importance of various components of acquisition. A comparative analysis was done with respect to the two types of institutions-centrally funded technical institutions and central universities. The conclusion of the research work is that the library staff of centrally funded technical institutions and central universities have different preferences for the factors affecting acquisition. The library staff of centrally funded technical institutions had the top priority for ‘ease of acquisition’ whereas their counterparts in central universities looked for ‘significance of the resources’ the most.
图书馆的信息生命周期包括获取,这是为图书馆获取文献的步骤之一。采购相关资源供用户使用。近年来,由于数字化、财务中断、各种交付模式等因素的影响,图书馆采访的过程发生了巨大的变化。本研究的目的是了解影响中央高校图书馆和外文院校采办政策的因素。该研究的文献综述来自Emerald、Taylor和Francis以及Web of Science等知名数据库,并开发了一个Prisma模型来缩小文献综述过程。使用NVivo与TreeMap和Word cloud一起了解文献缺口。向图书馆员、副图书馆员和助理图书馆员等图书馆工作人员发送了一份结构化的封闭式问卷,其中包含与获取有关的内容,以便收集原始数据。描述性统计应用于了解人口统计数据和理解的重要性的各个组成部分的收购。对中央资助的技术院校和中央资助的大学这两类机构进行了比较分析。研究结果表明,中央科技院校和中央高校图书馆工作人员对采访影响因素的偏好不同。中央资助的技术院校的图书馆工作人员最看重的是“容易获取”,而中央大学的图书馆工作人员最看重的是“资源的重要性”。