Easiness Amplification and Uniform Circuit Lower Bounds

Cody Murray, Richard Ryan Williams
{"title":"Easiness Amplification and Uniform Circuit Lower Bounds","authors":"Cody Murray, Richard Ryan Williams","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2017.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present new consequences of the assumption that time-bounded algorithms can be \"compressed\" with non-uniform circuits. Our main contribution is an \"easiness amplification\" lemma for circuits. One instantiation of the lemma says: if n^{1+e}-time, tilde{O}(n)-space computations have n^{1+o(1)} size (non-uniform) circuits for some e > 0, then every problem solvable in polynomial time and tilde{O}(n) space has n^{1+o(1)} size (non-uniform) circuits as well. This amplification has several consequences: \n \n* An easy problem without small LOGSPACE-uniform circuits. For all e > 0, we give a natural decision problem, General Circuit n^e-Composition, that is solvable in about n^{1+e} time, but we prove that polynomial-time and logarithmic-space preprocessing cannot produce n^{1+o(1)}-size circuits for the problem. This shows that there are problems solvable in n^{1+e} time which are not in LOGSPACE-uniform n^{1+o(1)} size, the first result of its kind. We show that our lower bound is non-relativizing, by exhibiting an oracle relative to which the result is false. \n \n* Problems without low-depth LOGSPACE-uniform circuits. For all e > 0, 1 < d < 2, and e < d we give another natural circuit composition problem computable in tilde{O}(n^{1+e}) time, or in O((log n)^d) space (though not necessarily simultaneously) that we prove does not have SPACE[(log n)^e]-uniform circuits of tilde{O}(n) size and O((log n)^e) depth. We also show SAT does not have circuits of tilde{O}(n) size and log^{2-o(1)}(n) depth that can be constructed in log^{2-o(1)}(n) space. \n \n* A strong circuit complexity amplification. For every e > 0, we give a natural circuit composition problem and show that if it has tilde{O}(n)-size circuits (uniform or not), then every problem solvable in 2^{O(n)} time and 2^{O(sqrt{n log n})} space (simultaneously) has 2^{O(sqrt{n log n})}-size circuits (uniform or not). We also show the same consequence holds assuming SAT has tilde{O}(n)-size circuits. As a corollary, if n^{1.1} time computations (or O(n) nondeterministic time computations) have tilde{O}(n)-size circuits, then all problems in exponential time and subexponential space (such as quantified Boolean formulas) have significantly subexponential-size circuits. This is a new connection between the relative circuit complexities of easy and hard problems.","PeriodicalId":246506,"journal":{"name":"Cybersecurity and Cyberforensics Conference","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cybersecurity and Cyberforensics Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2017.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We present new consequences of the assumption that time-bounded algorithms can be "compressed" with non-uniform circuits. Our main contribution is an "easiness amplification" lemma for circuits. One instantiation of the lemma says: if n^{1+e}-time, tilde{O}(n)-space computations have n^{1+o(1)} size (non-uniform) circuits for some e > 0, then every problem solvable in polynomial time and tilde{O}(n) space has n^{1+o(1)} size (non-uniform) circuits as well. This amplification has several consequences: * An easy problem without small LOGSPACE-uniform circuits. For all e > 0, we give a natural decision problem, General Circuit n^e-Composition, that is solvable in about n^{1+e} time, but we prove that polynomial-time and logarithmic-space preprocessing cannot produce n^{1+o(1)}-size circuits for the problem. This shows that there are problems solvable in n^{1+e} time which are not in LOGSPACE-uniform n^{1+o(1)} size, the first result of its kind. We show that our lower bound is non-relativizing, by exhibiting an oracle relative to which the result is false. * Problems without low-depth LOGSPACE-uniform circuits. For all e > 0, 1 < d < 2, and e < d we give another natural circuit composition problem computable in tilde{O}(n^{1+e}) time, or in O((log n)^d) space (though not necessarily simultaneously) that we prove does not have SPACE[(log n)^e]-uniform circuits of tilde{O}(n) size and O((log n)^e) depth. We also show SAT does not have circuits of tilde{O}(n) size and log^{2-o(1)}(n) depth that can be constructed in log^{2-o(1)}(n) space. * A strong circuit complexity amplification. For every e > 0, we give a natural circuit composition problem and show that if it has tilde{O}(n)-size circuits (uniform or not), then every problem solvable in 2^{O(n)} time and 2^{O(sqrt{n log n})} space (simultaneously) has 2^{O(sqrt{n log n})}-size circuits (uniform or not). We also show the same consequence holds assuming SAT has tilde{O}(n)-size circuits. As a corollary, if n^{1.1} time computations (or O(n) nondeterministic time computations) have tilde{O}(n)-size circuits, then all problems in exponential time and subexponential space (such as quantified Boolean formulas) have significantly subexponential-size circuits. This is a new connection between the relative circuit complexities of easy and hard problems.
放大和均匀电路下界
我们提出了假设的新结果,即有时间的算法可以用非均匀电路“压缩”。我们的主要贡献是电路的“易放大”引理。引理的一个实例是:如果n^{1+e}时间,波浪{O}(n)空间的计算对于某些e >具有n^{1+ O(1)}大小(非均匀)电路,那么在多项式时间和波浪{O}(n)空间中可解的每个问题也具有n^{1+ O(1)}大小(非均匀)电路。这种放大有几个后果:*没有小的LOGSPACE-uniform电路的简单问题。对于所有的e >,我们给出了一个自然决策问题,通用电路n^e- composition,在大约n^{1+e}时间内可解,但我们证明了多项式时间和对数空间预处理不能为该问题生成n^{1+o(1)}大小的电路。这表明存在在n^{1+e}时间内可解决的问题,而这些问题不在LOGSPACE-uniform的n^{1+o(1)}范围内,这是同类中的第一个结果。我们通过展示一个相对于其结果为假的预言来证明我们的下界是非相对化的。*没有低深度logspace统一电路的问题。对于所有e > 0, 1 < d < 2,和e < d,我们给出了另一个可以在波浪{O}(n^{1+e})时间或O((log n)^d)空间(虽然不一定同时)计算的自然电路组成问题,我们证明了它不具有空间[(log n)^e]-波浪{O}(n)大小和O((log n)^e)深度的均匀电路。我们还证明SAT不具有波浪{O}(n)大小和log^{2-o(1)}(n)深度的电路,这些电路可以在log^{2-o(1)}(n)空间中构造。*电路复杂度放大能力强。对于每一个e > 0,我们给出了一个自然电路组成问题,并证明了如果它具有波浪{O}(n)大小的电路(均匀与否),那么在2^{O(n)}时间和2^{O(sqrt{n log n})}空间(同时)可解的每一个问题都具有2^{O(sqrt{n log n})}大小的电路(均匀与否)。我们还展示了同样的结果,假设SAT具有波浪{O}(n)大小的电路。作为推论,如果n^{1.1}时间计算(或O(n)个不确定时间计算)具有波浪{O}(n)个大小的电路,那么指数时间和次指数空间中的所有问题(如量化布尔公式)都具有显著的次指数大小的电路。这是简单和困难问题的相对电路复杂性之间的一种新的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信