Viral vectors for cystic fibrosis gene therapy: What does the future hold?

U. Griesenbach, M. Inoue, M. Hasegawa, E. Alton
{"title":"Viral vectors for cystic fibrosis gene therapy: What does the future hold?","authors":"U. Griesenbach, M. Inoue, M. Hasegawa, E. Alton","doi":"10.2147/VAAT.S8887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correspondence: Uta Griesenbach Department of Gene Therapy, Faculty of Medicine at the National Heart and Lung institute, imperial College London, Manresa Road, London Sw3 6LR, UK Tel +44 207 351 8339 Fax +44 207 351 8340 email u.griesenbach@imperial.ac.uk Abstract: Gene transfer to the airway epithelium has been more difficult than originally anticipated, largely because of significant extraand intracellular barriers in the lung. In general, viral vectors are more adapted to overcoming these barriers than nonviral gene transfer agents and are, therefore, more efficient in transferring genes into recipient cells. Viral vectors derived from adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, and Sendai virus, which all have a natural tropism for the airway epithelium, have been evaluated for cystic fibrosis (CF) gene therapy. Although these vectors transduce airway epithelial cells efficiently, gene expression is transient and repeated administration is inefficient. They are, therefore, unlikely to be suitable for CF gene therapy. More recently, lentiviruses (LV) have been assessed for lung gene transfer. In contrast to retroviruses, they transduce nondividing cells and randomly integrate into the genome. However, LVs do not have a natural tropism for the lung, and a significant amount of effort has been put into pseudotyping these vectors with proteins suitable for airway gene transfer. Several studies have shown that LV-mediated transduction leads to persistent gene expression (for the lifetime of the animal) in the airways and, importantly, repeated administration is feasible. Thus, appropriately pseudotyped LV vectors are promising candidates for CF gene therapy. Here, we will review preclinical and clinical research related to viral CF gene therapy.","PeriodicalId":337688,"journal":{"name":"Virus Adaptation and Treatment","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virus Adaptation and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/VAAT.S8887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Correspondence: Uta Griesenbach Department of Gene Therapy, Faculty of Medicine at the National Heart and Lung institute, imperial College London, Manresa Road, London Sw3 6LR, UK Tel +44 207 351 8339 Fax +44 207 351 8340 email u.griesenbach@imperial.ac.uk Abstract: Gene transfer to the airway epithelium has been more difficult than originally anticipated, largely because of significant extraand intracellular barriers in the lung. In general, viral vectors are more adapted to overcoming these barriers than nonviral gene transfer agents and are, therefore, more efficient in transferring genes into recipient cells. Viral vectors derived from adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, and Sendai virus, which all have a natural tropism for the airway epithelium, have been evaluated for cystic fibrosis (CF) gene therapy. Although these vectors transduce airway epithelial cells efficiently, gene expression is transient and repeated administration is inefficient. They are, therefore, unlikely to be suitable for CF gene therapy. More recently, lentiviruses (LV) have been assessed for lung gene transfer. In contrast to retroviruses, they transduce nondividing cells and randomly integrate into the genome. However, LVs do not have a natural tropism for the lung, and a significant amount of effort has been put into pseudotyping these vectors with proteins suitable for airway gene transfer. Several studies have shown that LV-mediated transduction leads to persistent gene expression (for the lifetime of the animal) in the airways and, importantly, repeated administration is feasible. Thus, appropriately pseudotyped LV vectors are promising candidates for CF gene therapy. Here, we will review preclinical and clinical research related to viral CF gene therapy.
囊性纤维化基因治疗的病毒载体:前景如何?
通信:Uta Griesenbach基因治疗系,国家心脏和肺研究所医学院,伦敦帝国理工学院,Manresa路,伦敦Sw3 6LR, UK电话+44 207 351 8339传真+44 207 351 8340电子邮件u.griesenbach@imperial.ac.uk摘要:基因转移到气道上皮比最初预期的更加困难,主要是因为肺中存在显著的细胞外和细胞内屏障。一般来说,病毒载体比非病毒基因转移剂更适合克服这些障碍,因此,在将基因转移到受体细胞中更有效。来源于腺病毒、腺相关病毒和仙台病毒的病毒载体均对气道上皮具有天然的趋向性,已被评估用于囊性纤维化(CF)基因治疗。虽然这些载体能有效地转导气道上皮细胞,但基因表达是短暂的,重复给药是低效的。因此,它们不太可能适合CF基因治疗。最近,慢病毒(LV)已被评估为肺基因转移。与逆转录病毒不同,它们转导非分裂细胞并随机整合到基因组中。然而,lv对肺没有天然的趋向性,并且已经投入了大量的努力来用适合气道基因转移的蛋白质对这些载体进行假分型。几项研究表明,lv介导的转导导致气道中持续的基因表达(在动物的一生中),重要的是,重复给药是可行的。因此,适当的假型LV载体是CF基因治疗的有希望的候选者。在此,我们将回顾与病毒性CF基因治疗相关的临床前和临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信