5 Plasma volume support in cardiac surgery

BSc, MBBS, FRCA Ian Welsby (Critical Care Fellow), MBBS, FRCA, MD Michael (Monty) Mythen (Assistant Professor)
{"title":"5 Plasma volume support in cardiac surgery","authors":"BSc, MBBS, FRCA Ian Welsby (Critical Care Fellow),&nbsp;MBBS, FRCA, MD Michael (Monty) Mythen (Assistant Professor)","doi":"10.1016/S0950-3501(97)80007-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cardiac surgery involves major perturbations of normal physiology and organ perfusion including haemorrhage, an extracorporeal circuit, non-pulsatile blood flow, hypothermia and the resulting initiation of a systemic inflammatory response. Varying degrees of volume support are essential pre, during and post cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), as avoiding hypovolaemia improves both organ perfusion and outcome.</p><p>A target haematocrit determines whether or not blood is used; this review concentrates on available artificial solutions.</p><p>The colloid versus crystalloid controversy smoulders on particularly regarding pump primes and practice differs between centres, with cost and concerns of the safety of various colloids remaining the major contentions. Whilst cost is an issue there is no convincing evidence linking adverse outcomes to modern colloid solutions. Using crystalloid solutions, an expansion of the interstitial space and reduced colloid osmotic pressure (COP) seem to be inevitable consequences of CPB.</p><p>This may be important, because maintaining COP using colloid primes (often with hypertonic saline) has been associated with improved postoperative oxygenation and reduced ICU stay.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80610,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical anaesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3501(97)80007-4","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950350197800074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Cardiac surgery involves major perturbations of normal physiology and organ perfusion including haemorrhage, an extracorporeal circuit, non-pulsatile blood flow, hypothermia and the resulting initiation of a systemic inflammatory response. Varying degrees of volume support are essential pre, during and post cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), as avoiding hypovolaemia improves both organ perfusion and outcome.

A target haematocrit determines whether or not blood is used; this review concentrates on available artificial solutions.

The colloid versus crystalloid controversy smoulders on particularly regarding pump primes and practice differs between centres, with cost and concerns of the safety of various colloids remaining the major contentions. Whilst cost is an issue there is no convincing evidence linking adverse outcomes to modern colloid solutions. Using crystalloid solutions, an expansion of the interstitial space and reduced colloid osmotic pressure (COP) seem to be inevitable consequences of CPB.

This may be important, because maintaining COP using colloid primes (often with hypertonic saline) has been associated with improved postoperative oxygenation and reduced ICU stay.

心脏手术中的血浆容量支持
心脏手术涉及对正常生理和器官灌注的重大干扰,包括出血、体外循环、非搏动性血流、体温过低以及由此引发的全身炎症反应。不同程度的容量支持在体外循环(CPB)之前、期间和之后都是必不可少的,因为避免低容量血症可以改善器官灌注和预后。目标红细胞压积决定是否用血;本文主要综述了现有的人工解决方案。胶体与晶体的争论持续发酵,特别是关于泵的启动和不同中心之间的实践差异,各种胶体的成本和安全性仍然是主要的争论。虽然成本是一个问题,但没有令人信服的证据表明现代胶体解决方案会产生不良后果。使用晶体溶液,间隙空间的扩大和胶体渗透压(COP)的降低似乎是CPB不可避免的后果。这可能是重要的,因为使用胶体基质(通常使用高渗盐水)维持COP与改善术后氧合和减少ICU住院时间有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信