Access control enforcement testing

Donia El Kateb, Yehia Elrakaiby, T. Mouelhi, Yves Le Traon
{"title":"Access control enforcement testing","authors":"Donia El Kateb, Yehia Elrakaiby, T. Mouelhi, Yves Le Traon","doi":"10.1109/IWAST.2013.6595793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A policy-based access control architecture comprises Policy Enforcement Points (PEPs), which are modules that intercept subjects access requests and enforce the access decision reached by a Policy Decision Point (PDP), the module implementing the access decision logic. In applications, PEPs are generally implemented manually, which can introduce errors in policy enforcement and lead to security vulnerabilities. In this paper, we propose an approach to systematically test and validate the correct enforcement of access control policies in a given target application. More specifically, we rely on a two folded approach where a static analysis of the target application is first made to identify the sensitive accesses that could be regulated by the policy. The dynamic analysis of the application is then conducted using mutation to verify for every sensitive access whether the policy is correctly enforced. The dynamic analysis of the application also gives the exact location of the PEP to enable fixing enforcement errors detected by the analysis. The approach has been validated using a case study implementing an access control policy.","PeriodicalId":291838,"journal":{"name":"2013 8th International Workshop on Automation of Software Test (AST)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 8th International Workshop on Automation of Software Test (AST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWAST.2013.6595793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A policy-based access control architecture comprises Policy Enforcement Points (PEPs), which are modules that intercept subjects access requests and enforce the access decision reached by a Policy Decision Point (PDP), the module implementing the access decision logic. In applications, PEPs are generally implemented manually, which can introduce errors in policy enforcement and lead to security vulnerabilities. In this paper, we propose an approach to systematically test and validate the correct enforcement of access control policies in a given target application. More specifically, we rely on a two folded approach where a static analysis of the target application is first made to identify the sensitive accesses that could be regulated by the policy. The dynamic analysis of the application is then conducted using mutation to verify for every sensitive access whether the policy is correctly enforced. The dynamic analysis of the application also gives the exact location of the PEP to enable fixing enforcement errors detected by the analysis. The approach has been validated using a case study implementing an access control policy.
访问控制执行测试
基于策略的访问控制体系结构包括策略实施点(pep), pep是拦截主体访问请求并执行策略决策点(PDP)达成的访问决策的模块,PDP是实现访问决策逻辑的模块。在应用程序中,pep通常是手动实现的,这可能会在策略实施中引入错误并导致安全漏洞。在本文中,我们提出了一种在给定目标应用程序中系统地测试和验证访问控制策略的正确实施的方法。更具体地说,我们依赖于一种双重方法,首先对目标应用程序进行静态分析,以确定可以由策略管理的敏感访问。然后使用突变对应用程序进行动态分析,以验证每个敏感访问是否正确执行了策略。应用程序的动态分析还提供PEP的确切位置,以便修复分析检测到的强制执行错误。该方法已通过一个实现访问控制策略的案例研究得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信