The Signs of the Subject of a Crime under Article 243.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

I. A. Khalikov
{"title":"The Signs of the Subject of a Crime under Article 243.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation","authors":"I. A. Khalikov","doi":"10.37399/2686-9241.2021.1.113-127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. When studying history, the results of the work of archaeologists play a significant role. At the same time, for science, only those studies that are conducted by scientists on the basis of a state-issued permit (the so called open sheet) are of value. In accordance with the permit, scientists are required to provide reports on the excavations carried out and information about the objects found. This is what distinguishes professional archaeologists from non- professional history enthusiasts. Such enthusiasts dig atr archaeological sites because of their interest, to create private collections and to sell items of historical value in antique markets. By their actions, they commit crimes against cultural heritage. This makes it necessary to study the characteristics of the subject of the crime provided for in art. 243.2 of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation in order for criminal officers to properly deal with crimes in the field of archeology. Theoretical Basis. Methods. The research is based on general scientific and special research methods. The theoretical base consists of the works of domestic and foreign scientists in the field of law, history, archaeology, as well as the experience of competent authorities in the field of cultural heritage preservation. Results. The analysis of the work of the competent authorities and the study of legal literature led to the conclusion about the problems associated with the attribution to the subject of crime of persons searching for archaeological objects without obtaining a state permit. Discussion and Conclusion. Taking into account the accumulated international experience of countering illegal archaeology, studying domestic law enforcement practice, it is concluded that it is necessary to clarify the characteristics of the subject of the crime by making changes to the disposition of part 1 of art. 243.2 of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation.","PeriodicalId":184770,"journal":{"name":"Pravosudie / Justice","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravosudie / Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37399/2686-9241.2021.1.113-127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. When studying history, the results of the work of archaeologists play a significant role. At the same time, for science, only those studies that are conducted by scientists on the basis of a state-issued permit (the so called open sheet) are of value. In accordance with the permit, scientists are required to provide reports on the excavations carried out and information about the objects found. This is what distinguishes professional archaeologists from non- professional history enthusiasts. Such enthusiasts dig atr archaeological sites because of their interest, to create private collections and to sell items of historical value in antique markets. By their actions, they commit crimes against cultural heritage. This makes it necessary to study the characteristics of the subject of the crime provided for in art. 243.2 of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation in order for criminal officers to properly deal with crimes in the field of archeology. Theoretical Basis. Methods. The research is based on general scientific and special research methods. The theoretical base consists of the works of domestic and foreign scientists in the field of law, history, archaeology, as well as the experience of competent authorities in the field of cultural heritage preservation. Results. The analysis of the work of the competent authorities and the study of legal literature led to the conclusion about the problems associated with the attribution to the subject of crime of persons searching for archaeological objects without obtaining a state permit. Discussion and Conclusion. Taking into account the accumulated international experience of countering illegal archaeology, studying domestic law enforcement practice, it is concluded that it is necessary to clarify the characteristics of the subject of the crime by making changes to the disposition of part 1 of art. 243.2 of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation.
《俄罗斯联邦刑法典》第243.2条规定的犯罪主体的标志
介绍。在研究历史时,考古学家的工作结果起着重要的作用。与此同时,对于科学来说,只有那些由科学家在国家颁发的许可证(所谓的开放表格)的基础上进行的研究才有价值。根据许可证,科学家必须提供挖掘工作的报告和发现物品的信息。这就是专业考古学家与非专业历史爱好者的区别。这些狂热者挖掘考古遗址是因为他们的兴趣,创造私人收藏,并在古董市场上出售具有历史价值的物品。他们的行为构成了对文化遗产的犯罪。这就有必要研究art规定的犯罪主体的特征。《俄罗斯联邦刑法典》第243.2条,以便刑事官员妥善处理考古领域的犯罪。理论基础。方法。本研究是基于一般科学和特殊的研究方法。理论基础包括国内外法律、历史、考古等领域科学家的著作以及主管部门在文化遗产保护领域的经验。结果。通过对主管当局工作的分析和对法律文献的研究,得出了有关在没有获得国家许可的情况下搜索考古物品的人被归为犯罪主体的相关问题的结论。讨论与结论。结合国际上积累的打击非法考古的经验,研究国内执法实践,认为有必要通过对艺术品第一部分处分的变更,明确犯罪主体的特征。《俄罗斯联邦刑法》第243.2条。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信