The Green Future and the Golden Past: Issues and Approaches Regarding the Sustainability of Historical Structures and Sites

Steven Moctezuma
{"title":"The Green Future and the Golden Past: Issues and Approaches Regarding the Sustainability of Historical Structures and Sites","authors":"Steven Moctezuma","doi":"10.58948/0738-6206.1883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article illustrates the harmonies and conflict between historic preservation and environmental law in the context of urgently meeting climate change challenges. The Article presents an overarching analysis of the relationship between historic preservation and environmentalism, discerning unifying aspects and modern conflicts through statutory laws and case studies. It begins with detailing the parallel goals between the two causes, drawing on key similarities between the National Historic Preservation Act and the National Environmental Policy Act, the main tools for ensuring federal review for each field, and highlighting sustainable refurbishment as a prime example on achieving both ends with the same means. The Article then shifts towards their increasing conflict in the context of climate change action, looking at, for example, the friction between the rapid energy transition and historic preservation federal review. Because deceleration caused by federal review is not feasible in meeting current ambitious emission goals, the Article posits streamlined solutions that can be implemented to ensure each set of goals are met efficiently. This Article concludes with an analysis of these solutions within these unreconciled areas.","PeriodicalId":136205,"journal":{"name":"Pace Environmental Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace Environmental Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58948/0738-6206.1883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Article illustrates the harmonies and conflict between historic preservation and environmental law in the context of urgently meeting climate change challenges. The Article presents an overarching analysis of the relationship between historic preservation and environmentalism, discerning unifying aspects and modern conflicts through statutory laws and case studies. It begins with detailing the parallel goals between the two causes, drawing on key similarities between the National Historic Preservation Act and the National Environmental Policy Act, the main tools for ensuring federal review for each field, and highlighting sustainable refurbishment as a prime example on achieving both ends with the same means. The Article then shifts towards their increasing conflict in the context of climate change action, looking at, for example, the friction between the rapid energy transition and historic preservation federal review. Because deceleration caused by federal review is not feasible in meeting current ambitious emission goals, the Article posits streamlined solutions that can be implemented to ensure each set of goals are met efficiently. This Article concludes with an analysis of these solutions within these unreconciled areas.
绿色的未来和金色的过去:关于历史建筑和遗址可持续性的问题和方法
本文阐述了在紧急应对气候变化挑战的背景下,历史保护与环境法之间的和谐与冲突。本文对历史保护与环境保护之间的关系进行了总体分析,并通过成文法和案例分析识别出两者的统一方面和现代冲突。文章首先详细介绍了这两个目标之间的相似之处,指出了《国家历史保护法案》和《国家环境政策法案》之间的关键相似之处,这是确保联邦政府对每个领域进行审查的主要工具,并强调了可持续翻新是用同样的手段实现两个目标的主要例子。然后,文章转向他们在气候变化行动背景下日益增加的冲突,例如,关注快速能源转型与历史保护联邦审查之间的摩擦。由于联邦审查造成的减速在实现当前雄心勃勃的排放目标方面是不可行的,因此该条款提出了可以实施的简化解决方案,以确保有效地实现每一组目标。本文最后对这些不协调领域的解决方案进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信