Radiographic parameters of the normal ankle syndesmosis: Comparison between hindfoot alignment view and anteroposterior view

Jaehyung Lee, H. Lee, Ji Wan Kim, Bum-Sik Lee, Youngrak Choi
{"title":"Radiographic parameters of the normal ankle syndesmosis: Comparison between hindfoot alignment view and anteroposterior view","authors":"Jaehyung Lee, H. Lee, Ji Wan Kim, Bum-Sik Lee, Youngrak Choi","doi":"10.1177/03000605221098862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To compare the parameters associated with the normal ankle syndesmosis between the hindfoot alignment view (HAV) and anteroposterior (AP) view and determine which view is more accurate for comparing the left and right ankles. Methods This study involved 61 subjects without syndesmosis injury who had radiographs of both ankles. The tibiofibular clear space (TFCS), tibiofibular overlap (TFO), and medial clear space (MCS) were measured in each view. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess the agreement between the two ankles. Difference ratios for the measured parameters between the ankles were also compared. Results The agreement for TFCS showed wide disparity between the two ankles (AP view, 0.576; HAV, 0.858). The highest degree of agreement was seen for TFO (AP view, 0.733; HAV, 0.926). The agreement for MCS was low in both groups. The mean difference ratio for TFCS was also lower in the HAV group (9.9%) than in the AP view group (16.4%); a similar result was observed for TFO (16.4% vs. 25.8%). Conclusions For evaluation of the syndesmosis, use of the HAV showed increased accuracy and few measurement errors when comparing the left and right ankles relative to use of the AP view.","PeriodicalId":245557,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"192 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605221098862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective To compare the parameters associated with the normal ankle syndesmosis between the hindfoot alignment view (HAV) and anteroposterior (AP) view and determine which view is more accurate for comparing the left and right ankles. Methods This study involved 61 subjects without syndesmosis injury who had radiographs of both ankles. The tibiofibular clear space (TFCS), tibiofibular overlap (TFO), and medial clear space (MCS) were measured in each view. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess the agreement between the two ankles. Difference ratios for the measured parameters between the ankles were also compared. Results The agreement for TFCS showed wide disparity between the two ankles (AP view, 0.576; HAV, 0.858). The highest degree of agreement was seen for TFO (AP view, 0.733; HAV, 0.926). The agreement for MCS was low in both groups. The mean difference ratio for TFCS was also lower in the HAV group (9.9%) than in the AP view group (16.4%); a similar result was observed for TFO (16.4% vs. 25.8%). Conclusions For evaluation of the syndesmosis, use of the HAV showed increased accuracy and few measurement errors when comparing the left and right ankles relative to use of the AP view.
正常踝关节联合的影像学参数:后足正位与正位的比较
目的比较后足对正位(HAV)和正位(AP)观与正常踝关节联合的相关参数,确定哪一种观比较左右踝关节更准确。方法本研究纳入61例无关节联合损伤且有双踝x线片的受试者。在每个视图中测量胫腓骨间隙(TFCS),胫腓骨重叠(TFO)和内侧间隙(MCS)。使用类内相关系数来评估两个踝关节之间的一致性。还比较了踝关节间测量参数的差异比。结果两踝关节间TFCS一致性差异较大(AP视图,0.576;甲型肝炎,0.858)。TFO的一致性程度最高(AP视图,0.733;甲型肝炎,0.926)。两组对MCS的认同程度都很低。HAV组TFCS的平均差比(9.9%)也低于AP视图组(16.4%);TFO观察到类似的结果(16.4%对25.8%)。结论:在评估关节联合时,相对于使用AP视图,使用HAV在比较左右脚踝时显示出更高的准确性和很少的测量误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信