The Court of Arbitration for Sport Positions on Fault or Negligence of Anti-Doping Regulation Violations in Football

I. Vasilyev, Margarita Izmalkova, R. Khalatova, Anastasia Alexandrova, Evgeniya Y. Vetrova
{"title":"The Court of Arbitration for Sport Positions on Fault or Negligence of Anti-Doping Regulation Violations in Football","authors":"I. Vasilyev, Margarita Izmalkova, R. Khalatova, Anastasia Alexandrova, Evgeniya Y. Vetrova","doi":"10.13187/rjcl.2019.2.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scientific researches on the legal regulations of the fight against doping are carried out mainly in the Western doctrine within the framework of International law, Sports law, human rights, and European Union law. In post-Soviet legal science there is an intensive growth in the number of sports research, mainly sectoral (administrative, constitutional, labor, criminal law). However, there is practically no research on FIFA Anti-Doping Regulations. There is a difference between the two forms of anti-doping rule violation: the first form is the presence of a prohibited substance in an athlete’s sample, the second form is the use of a prohibited substance by an athlete. In this study, we will analyze the practice of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (hereinafter – CAS, arbitration) in cases of anti-doping regulation violations on issues of fault or negligence in football and draw conclusions, what facts can be accepted by the arbitration.","PeriodicalId":198310,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Comparative Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13187/rjcl.2019.2.94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scientific researches on the legal regulations of the fight against doping are carried out mainly in the Western doctrine within the framework of International law, Sports law, human rights, and European Union law. In post-Soviet legal science there is an intensive growth in the number of sports research, mainly sectoral (administrative, constitutional, labor, criminal law). However, there is practically no research on FIFA Anti-Doping Regulations. There is a difference between the two forms of anti-doping rule violation: the first form is the presence of a prohibited substance in an athlete’s sample, the second form is the use of a prohibited substance by an athlete. In this study, we will analyze the practice of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (hereinafter – CAS, arbitration) in cases of anti-doping regulation violations on issues of fault or negligence in football and draw conclusions, what facts can be accepted by the arbitration.
足球运动员违反反兴奋剂条例的过错或过失体育仲裁法庭
关于反兴奋剂法律规制的科学研究主要是在国际法、体育法、人权法和欧盟法框架内的西方学说中进行的。在后苏联法律科学中,体育研究的数量有了密集的增长,主要是部门(行政,宪法,劳动法,刑法)。然而,关于国际足联反兴奋剂条例的研究几乎没有。违反反兴奋剂规则的两种形式是有区别的:第一种形式是运动员的样本中存在禁用物质,第二种形式是运动员使用禁用物质。在本研究中,我们将分析国际体育仲裁法庭(以下简称CAS,简称仲裁)在违反反兴奋剂条例案件中对足球运动中的过失或疏忽问题的实践,并得出结论,哪些事实可以被仲裁所接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信