THE STUDENTS' MENTAL PROCESS OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILL ANALYZING LITERARY WORK

Moh. Hafidz, P. Retnaningdyah, Ali Mustofa, S. Setiawan, O. Purwati
{"title":"THE STUDENTS' MENTAL PROCESS OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILL ANALYZING LITERARY WORK","authors":"Moh. Hafidz, P. Retnaningdyah, Ali Mustofa, S. Setiawan, O. Purwati","doi":"10.32682/jeell.v8i2.2175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purposive behavior directly convey the students' mental process of critical thinking skill in analyzing literary work and producing composition. There is a theoretical and practical gap between the critical thinking process and products. This research descriptively designs to answer research problems. The previous study investigates the students’ written products and claims that they have a good critical thinking when they have multi references. In contrast, critical thinking is process of mental which students not only finding new information from some resources but also realizing their learning objective, identifying problems to motivate themselves to write a composition. As the results, the students who have a low level of critical thinking skill and they strongly aware of their gaps will analyze the literary work well, and a high level of critical thinking makes a power of analysis, an accurate and precise composition. Student’s mental process of critical thinking appears on the students’ process to read and cite a number of literacies, detect self-problem, encourage themselves to make a written texts based on the learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":362374,"journal":{"name":"JEELL (Journal of English Education, Linguistics and Literature) English Department of STKIP PGRI Jombang","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEELL (Journal of English Education, Linguistics and Literature) English Department of STKIP PGRI Jombang","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32682/jeell.v8i2.2175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purposive behavior directly convey the students' mental process of critical thinking skill in analyzing literary work and producing composition. There is a theoretical and practical gap between the critical thinking process and products. This research descriptively designs to answer research problems. The previous study investigates the students’ written products and claims that they have a good critical thinking when they have multi references. In contrast, critical thinking is process of mental which students not only finding new information from some resources but also realizing their learning objective, identifying problems to motivate themselves to write a composition. As the results, the students who have a low level of critical thinking skill and they strongly aware of their gaps will analyze the literary work well, and a high level of critical thinking makes a power of analysis, an accurate and precise composition. Student’s mental process of critical thinking appears on the students’ process to read and cite a number of literacies, detect self-problem, encourage themselves to make a written texts based on the learning outcomes.
学生批判性思维技能分析文学作品的心理过程
目的行为直接传达了学生在分析文学作品和创作文学作品时批判性思维技能的心理过程。在批判性思维过程和产品之间存在着理论和实践上的差距。本研究以描述性设计来回答研究问题。先前的研究调查了学生的书面产品,并声称当他们有多个参考文献时,他们有很好的批判性思维。相比之下,批判性思维是学生从一些资源中寻找新信息,实现自己的学习目标,发现问题,激励自己写作文的心理过程。因此,批判性思维水平较低且意识到自己存在差距的学生能够很好地分析文学作品,而批判性思维水平较高的学生则具有很强的分析能力,能够写出准确而精确的文章。学生批判性思维的心理过程出现在学生阅读和引用一些文学作品、发现自我问题、鼓励自己根据学习成果编写书面文本的过程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信