İnterskalen brakiyal pleksus blok uygulamalarında ultrason ve sinir stimülatörü tekniklerinin etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılması

A. Mizrak, R. Saruhan, Levent Şahi̇n, Vahap Saricicek, Zeliha Beyza Bayrak, S. Ganidağli, S. Göksu
{"title":"İnterskalen brakiyal pleksus blok uygulamalarında ultrason ve sinir stimülatörü tekniklerinin etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılması","authors":"A. Mizrak, R. Saruhan, Levent Şahi̇n, Vahap Saricicek, Zeliha Beyza Bayrak, S. Ganidağli, S. Göksu","doi":"10.5455/GMJ-30-2012-122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are potential advantages and disadvantages during ultrasonographic and peripheral nerve stimulating techniques in interscalen plexus blockade. In this study, we aimed to compare the sensory and motor blockade onset time and the duration of postoperative analgesic requirement during interscalen blockade performed with ultrasound and peripheral nerve stimulating techniques. Sixty patients in ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologysts) 1-2 groups were accepted in this prospective and double blind study for the shoulder surgery. Twenty-five ml 0.5% Levobupivacaine was administered to each patient group. The sensory blockade was evaluated with Pinprick test and the motor blockade was evaluated with the Bromage Scale. The duration of the sensorial and the motor blockade and the duration of postoperative first analgesic requirement were noted. The demographic data were similar between the groups. The onset time of sensorial and the motor blockades in group U was significantly shorter than in group S and the first analgesic requirement time in group U was significantly longer than in group S. During the interscalen blockade performed with ultrasound and peripheral nerve stimulator, it was observed that the sensorial and motor blockade was developed faster and the duration of first analgesic requirement was longer with ultrasound technique. Furthermore, it was determined that postoperative patient comfort score was more satisfied by ultrasound technique.","PeriodicalId":290827,"journal":{"name":"Gaziantep Medical Journal","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaziantep Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/GMJ-30-2012-122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are potential advantages and disadvantages during ultrasonographic and peripheral nerve stimulating techniques in interscalen plexus blockade. In this study, we aimed to compare the sensory and motor blockade onset time and the duration of postoperative analgesic requirement during interscalen blockade performed with ultrasound and peripheral nerve stimulating techniques. Sixty patients in ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologysts) 1-2 groups were accepted in this prospective and double blind study for the shoulder surgery. Twenty-five ml 0.5% Levobupivacaine was administered to each patient group. The sensory blockade was evaluated with Pinprick test and the motor blockade was evaluated with the Bromage Scale. The duration of the sensorial and the motor blockade and the duration of postoperative first analgesic requirement were noted. The demographic data were similar between the groups. The onset time of sensorial and the motor blockades in group U was significantly shorter than in group S and the first analgesic requirement time in group U was significantly longer than in group S. During the interscalen blockade performed with ultrasound and peripheral nerve stimulator, it was observed that the sensorial and motor blockade was developed faster and the duration of first analgesic requirement was longer with ultrasound technique. Furthermore, it was determined that postoperative patient comfort score was more satisfied by ultrasound technique.
超声和周围神经刺激技术在肌间神经丛阻断术中有各自的优缺点。在这项研究中,我们的目的是比较超声和周围神经刺激技术在进行鳞间阻滞时感觉和运动阻滞的起效时间和术后镇痛需求的持续时间。ASA (American Society of anesthesiologists) 1-2组60例患者被纳入这项前瞻性双盲肩部手术研究。每组患者给予0.5%左布比卡因25 ml。用针刺试验评价感觉阻滞,用Bromage量表评价运动阻滞。记录感觉阻滞和运动阻滞的持续时间以及术后首次镇痛需要的持续时间。两组之间的人口统计数据相似。U组感觉和运动阻滞的起效时间明显短于S组,U组首次镇痛需要时间明显长于S组。超声和周围神经刺激器进行的肌间阻滞时,观察到超声技术的感觉和运动阻滞发展更快,首次镇痛需要时间更长。此外,超声技术对术后患者舒适度评分更满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信