{"title":"Le \"catharisme\" en questions ed. by Jean-Louis Biget et al. (review)","authors":"Delfi I. Nieto-Isabel","doi":"10.1353/cat.2023.a899384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"torical moment to which it speaks. Of particular interest to Latinists, furthermore, will be De Jong and Lake’s discussion of the Epitaphium’s parallels with Ambrose of Milan’s De excessu fratris sui Satyri, a funeral oration that Ambrose composed in the year 378 on the occasion of his own brother’s death. Connections to this earlier text have gone virtually unnoticed by previous editors and translators of the Epitaphium. Yet Paschasius’s extensive intertextual borrowing (made patent in extensive notes to the body of the translation) proves crucial to De Jong and Lake’s arguments for Paschasius’s planned composition of the two books.","PeriodicalId":203064,"journal":{"name":"The Catholic Historical Review","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Catholic Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cat.2023.a899384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
torical moment to which it speaks. Of particular interest to Latinists, furthermore, will be De Jong and Lake’s discussion of the Epitaphium’s parallels with Ambrose of Milan’s De excessu fratris sui Satyri, a funeral oration that Ambrose composed in the year 378 on the occasion of his own brother’s death. Connections to this earlier text have gone virtually unnoticed by previous editors and translators of the Epitaphium. Yet Paschasius’s extensive intertextual borrowing (made patent in extensive notes to the body of the translation) proves crucial to De Jong and Lake’s arguments for Paschasius’s planned composition of the two books.
这是一个历史性的时刻。此外,拉丁主义者特别感兴趣的是德容和雷克对墓志铭与安布罗斯在米兰的De excessu fratris sui Satyri的相似之处的讨论,安布罗斯在378年为他自己的兄弟去世而写的葬礼致辞。墓志铭的先前编辑和翻译家几乎没有注意到与这个早期文本的联系。然而,帕夏修广泛的互文借用(在翻译主体的大量注释中获得专利)证明了德容和莱克对帕夏修计划的两本书组成的论点至关重要。