Le "catharisme" en questions ed. by Jean-Louis Biget et al. (review)

Delfi I. Nieto-Isabel
{"title":"Le \"catharisme\" en questions ed. by Jean-Louis Biget et al. (review)","authors":"Delfi I. Nieto-Isabel","doi":"10.1353/cat.2023.a899384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"torical moment to which it speaks. Of particular interest to Latinists, furthermore, will be De Jong and Lake’s discussion of the Epitaphium’s parallels with Ambrose of Milan’s De excessu fratris sui Satyri, a funeral oration that Ambrose composed in the year 378 on the occasion of his own brother’s death. Connections to this earlier text have gone virtually unnoticed by previous editors and translators of the Epitaphium. Yet Paschasius’s extensive intertextual borrowing (made patent in extensive notes to the body of the translation) proves crucial to De Jong and Lake’s arguments for Paschasius’s planned composition of the two books.","PeriodicalId":203064,"journal":{"name":"The Catholic Historical Review","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Catholic Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cat.2023.a899384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

torical moment to which it speaks. Of particular interest to Latinists, furthermore, will be De Jong and Lake’s discussion of the Epitaphium’s parallels with Ambrose of Milan’s De excessu fratris sui Satyri, a funeral oration that Ambrose composed in the year 378 on the occasion of his own brother’s death. Connections to this earlier text have gone virtually unnoticed by previous editors and translators of the Epitaphium. Yet Paschasius’s extensive intertextual borrowing (made patent in extensive notes to the body of the translation) proves crucial to De Jong and Lake’s arguments for Paschasius’s planned composition of the two books.
Jean-Louis Biget et al编辑的《净化》(catharisme)问题(回顾)
这是一个历史性的时刻。此外,拉丁主义者特别感兴趣的是德容和雷克对墓志铭与安布罗斯在米兰的De excessu fratris sui Satyri的相似之处的讨论,安布罗斯在378年为他自己的兄弟去世而写的葬礼致辞。墓志铭的先前编辑和翻译家几乎没有注意到与这个早期文本的联系。然而,帕夏修广泛的互文借用(在翻译主体的大量注释中获得专利)证明了德容和莱克对帕夏修计划的两本书组成的论点至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信