D. Waber, Ellen C. Boiselle, J. Girard, Joseph L. Amaral, P. Forbes
{"title":"Ascertaining educational outcomes after assessment in children with learning disorders","authors":"D. Waber, Ellen C. Boiselle, J. Girard, Joseph L. Amaral, P. Forbes","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2016.1244289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: To survey educational outcomes after an interdisciplinary, neuropsychologically based team assessment for learning disorders.Method: Parents of 137 children who underwent a comprehensive interdisciplinary neuropsychologically based assessment for learning problems completed an online survey one to four years later. Questions pertained broadly to school outcomes: positive or negative school responses, changes in special education services, and parental perceptions about the helpfulness of those services. These outcomes were examined in relation to demographic characteristics and parent satisfaction with the evaluation. We also obtained recent performance on state-based academic testing for descriptive purposes.Results: Parents reported that schools generally responded positively (78%), and 70% reported that their children had access to more or different special education services after the evaluation. Parents nearly uniformly (98%) viewed these services as helpful. Positive changes in education services were related to income (lower income received more services, p < .05) and parent satisfaction with the evaluation (p < .05). The intensity of special education services was strongly related to performance on state-based testing (p < .0001–p < .01).Conclusions: School response is a relatively objective and meaningful metric of educational outcome after neuropsychologically based evaluation for children with learning problems.","PeriodicalId":197334,"journal":{"name":"The Clinical neuropsychologist","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Clinical neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1244289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
Abstract Objective: To survey educational outcomes after an interdisciplinary, neuropsychologically based team assessment for learning disorders.Method: Parents of 137 children who underwent a comprehensive interdisciplinary neuropsychologically based assessment for learning problems completed an online survey one to four years later. Questions pertained broadly to school outcomes: positive or negative school responses, changes in special education services, and parental perceptions about the helpfulness of those services. These outcomes were examined in relation to demographic characteristics and parent satisfaction with the evaluation. We also obtained recent performance on state-based academic testing for descriptive purposes.Results: Parents reported that schools generally responded positively (78%), and 70% reported that their children had access to more or different special education services after the evaluation. Parents nearly uniformly (98%) viewed these services as helpful. Positive changes in education services were related to income (lower income received more services, p < .05) and parent satisfaction with the evaluation (p < .05). The intensity of special education services was strongly related to performance on state-based testing (p < .0001–p < .01).Conclusions: School response is a relatively objective and meaningful metric of educational outcome after neuropsychologically based evaluation for children with learning problems.