Recommending Terms for Glossaries: A Computer-Based Approach

E. Knauss, Sebastian Meyer, K. Schneider
{"title":"Recommending Terms for Glossaries: A Computer-Based Approach","authors":"E. Knauss, Sebastian Meyer, K. Schneider","doi":"10.1109/MARK.2008.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Glossaries in Software Requirements Specifications (SRS) aim at establishing a common ground of definitions. However, ambiguous terms as due to tacit knowledge are seldom captured in glossaries. In addition, even if they are captured, they are seldom read, because potential readers are convinced that they already know how the term is defined. Such misunderstandings introduce high risks in projects - especially because they are so hard to detect. Therefore, a trigger is needed to start a discussion about these potentially dangerous terms. In this paper we show how context aware requirements engineering tools can heuristically detect these terms and point out the risk attached. We introduce two simple, yet powerful heuristics: Occurence counting detects important terms, comparison with old glossaries detects terms that others found worth defining in a glossary. Thus, we make use of glossaries from past projects to suggest possible terms of interest for current projects. Our approach was implemented and applied to six software projects. Based on these experiences we show the effectivity of our heuristics and how they could be used by learning organizations to reduce such ambiguity risks in their specific domain.","PeriodicalId":319454,"journal":{"name":"2008 First International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 First International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MARK.2008.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Glossaries in Software Requirements Specifications (SRS) aim at establishing a common ground of definitions. However, ambiguous terms as due to tacit knowledge are seldom captured in glossaries. In addition, even if they are captured, they are seldom read, because potential readers are convinced that they already know how the term is defined. Such misunderstandings introduce high risks in projects - especially because they are so hard to detect. Therefore, a trigger is needed to start a discussion about these potentially dangerous terms. In this paper we show how context aware requirements engineering tools can heuristically detect these terms and point out the risk attached. We introduce two simple, yet powerful heuristics: Occurence counting detects important terms, comparison with old glossaries detects terms that others found worth defining in a glossary. Thus, we make use of glossaries from past projects to suggest possible terms of interest for current projects. Our approach was implemented and applied to six software projects. Based on these experiences we show the effectivity of our heuristics and how they could be used by learning organizations to reduce such ambiguity risks in their specific domain.
推荐词汇表术语:基于计算机的方法
软件需求规范(SRS)中的术语表旨在建立定义的共同基础。然而,由于隐性知识而产生的歧义术语在词汇表中很少被捕获。此外,即使它们被捕获,也很少有人阅读,因为潜在的读者相信他们已经知道这个术语是如何定义的。这种误解给项目带来了高风险——尤其是因为它们很难被发现。因此,需要一个触发器来启动对这些潜在危险术语的讨论。在本文中,我们展示了上下文感知需求工程工具如何启发式地检测这些术语并指出所附带的风险。我们介绍两种简单但功能强大的启发式方法:出现次数计数检测重要术语,与旧词汇表比较检测其他人认为值得在术语表中定义的术语。因此,我们使用过去项目中的词汇表来建议当前项目可能感兴趣的术语。我们的方法被实现并应用到六个软件项目中。基于这些经验,我们展示了我们的启发式的有效性,以及学习型组织如何使用它们来减少其特定领域中的这种模糊性风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信