Artificial Intelligence and Transparency: A Blueprint for Improving the Regulation of AI Applications in the EU

A. Wulf, O. Seizov
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence and Transparency: A Blueprint for Improving the Regulation of AI Applications in the EU","authors":"A. Wulf, O. Seizov","doi":"10.54648/eulr2020024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adoption of Artificial Intelligence is steadily increasing, but the underlying algorithms have become so complex that they are no longer transparent. The EU has introduced some modest AI transparency requirements as part of its General Data Protection Regulation. However, two years after their introduction, the effectiveness of these rules remains questionable. Our aim is to contribute towards the further development of a governance framework for AI. We begin by explaining how the algorithms that enable the speed and data processing power of AI also obscure its transparency. We review how major guidelines on AI ethics operationalize algorithmic transparency, following which we assess whether these principles are adequately covered by the GDPR. We then present the results of semi-structured interviews of a heterogeneous sample of stakeholders of consumer information online (N=75). Our data provide evidence that the current implementation of the EU’s informed consumer paradigm fails to establish a satisfactory level of consumer protection and information online. If simple technological applications such as cookies remain non-transparent to consumers, the current approaches are entirely incapable of addressing the problem of complex AI applications. We conclude by formulating a policy proposal as to how the transparency of AI applications could be improved from the perspective of end users.\nartificial intelligence, explainable AI, automated individual decision-making, profiling, consumer protection, data protection, GDPR, information disclosures, transparency, AI ethics","PeriodicalId":241211,"journal":{"name":"CompSciRN: Artificial Intelligence (Topic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CompSciRN: Artificial Intelligence (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2020024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The adoption of Artificial Intelligence is steadily increasing, but the underlying algorithms have become so complex that they are no longer transparent. The EU has introduced some modest AI transparency requirements as part of its General Data Protection Regulation. However, two years after their introduction, the effectiveness of these rules remains questionable. Our aim is to contribute towards the further development of a governance framework for AI. We begin by explaining how the algorithms that enable the speed and data processing power of AI also obscure its transparency. We review how major guidelines on AI ethics operationalize algorithmic transparency, following which we assess whether these principles are adequately covered by the GDPR. We then present the results of semi-structured interviews of a heterogeneous sample of stakeholders of consumer information online (N=75). Our data provide evidence that the current implementation of the EU’s informed consumer paradigm fails to establish a satisfactory level of consumer protection and information online. If simple technological applications such as cookies remain non-transparent to consumers, the current approaches are entirely incapable of addressing the problem of complex AI applications. We conclude by formulating a policy proposal as to how the transparency of AI applications could be improved from the perspective of end users. artificial intelligence, explainable AI, automated individual decision-making, profiling, consumer protection, data protection, GDPR, information disclosures, transparency, AI ethics
人工智能和透明度:改善欧盟人工智能应用监管的蓝图
人工智能的采用正在稳步增加,但底层算法已经变得如此复杂,以至于它们不再透明。欧盟在其《通用数据保护条例》(General Data Protection Regulation)中引入了一些适度的人工智能透明度要求。然而,在出台两年后,这些规定的有效性仍然值得怀疑。我们的目标是为人工智能治理框架的进一步发展做出贡献。我们首先解释,使人工智能的速度和数据处理能力得以实现的算法如何也模糊了它的透明度。我们回顾了人工智能伦理的主要指导方针是如何实现算法透明度的,然后评估这些原则是否被GDPR充分涵盖。然后,我们提出了半结构化访谈的结果消费者信息的异质样本的利益相关者在线(N=75)。我们的数据提供证据表明,目前欧盟知情消费者范式的实施未能建立一个令人满意的消费者保护水平和在线信息。如果简单的技术应用(如cookie)对消费者仍然不透明,那么目前的方法完全无法解决复杂的人工智能应用问题。最后,我们制定了一项政策建议,即如何从最终用户的角度提高人工智能应用的透明度。人工智能、可解释的人工智能、自动化个人决策、分析、消费者保护、数据保护、GDPR、信息披露、透明度、人工智能伦理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信