Follow the Successful Herd: Towards Explanations for Improved Use and Mental Models of Natural Language Systems

Michelle Brachman, Qian Pan, H. Do, Casey Dugan, Arunima Chaudhary, James M. Johnson, Priyanshu Rai, T. Chakraborti, T. Gschwind, Jim Laredo, Christoph Miksovic, P. Scotton, Kartik Talamadupula, Gegi Thomas
{"title":"Follow the Successful Herd: Towards Explanations for Improved Use and Mental Models of Natural Language Systems","authors":"Michelle Brachman, Qian Pan, H. Do, Casey Dugan, Arunima Chaudhary, James M. Johnson, Priyanshu Rai, T. Chakraborti, T. Gschwind, Jim Laredo, Christoph Miksovic, P. Scotton, Kartik Talamadupula, Gegi Thomas","doi":"10.1145/3581641.3584088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While natural language systems continue improving, they are still imperfect. If a user has a better understanding of how a system works, they may be able to better accomplish their goals even in imperfect systems. We explored whether explanations can support effective authoring of natural language utterances and how those explanations impact users’ mental models in the context of a natural language system that generates small programs. Through an online study (n=252), we compared two main types of explanations: 1) system-focused, which provide information about how the system processes utterances and matches terms to a knowledge base, and 2) social, which provide information about how other users have successfully interacted with the system. Our results indicate that providing social suggestions of terms to add to an utterance helped users to repair and generate correct flows more than system-focused explanations or social recommendations of words to modify. We also found that participants commonly understood some mechanisms of the natural language system, such as the matching of terms to a knowledge base, but they often lacked other critical knowledge, such as how the system handled structuring and ordering. Based on these findings, we make design recommendations for supporting interactions with and understanding of natural language systems.","PeriodicalId":118159,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3581641.3584088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While natural language systems continue improving, they are still imperfect. If a user has a better understanding of how a system works, they may be able to better accomplish their goals even in imperfect systems. We explored whether explanations can support effective authoring of natural language utterances and how those explanations impact users’ mental models in the context of a natural language system that generates small programs. Through an online study (n=252), we compared two main types of explanations: 1) system-focused, which provide information about how the system processes utterances and matches terms to a knowledge base, and 2) social, which provide information about how other users have successfully interacted with the system. Our results indicate that providing social suggestions of terms to add to an utterance helped users to repair and generate correct flows more than system-focused explanations or social recommendations of words to modify. We also found that participants commonly understood some mechanisms of the natural language system, such as the matching of terms to a knowledge base, but they often lacked other critical knowledge, such as how the system handled structuring and ordering. Based on these findings, we make design recommendations for supporting interactions with and understanding of natural language systems.
跟随成功的羊群:对自然语言系统的改进使用和心理模型的解释
虽然自然语言系统在不断改进,但它们仍然不完美。如果用户对系统如何工作有了更好的理解,即使在不完美的系统中,他们也可以更好地完成目标。我们探讨了解释是否可以支持自然语言话语的有效创作,以及在生成小程序的自然语言系统的背景下,这些解释如何影响用户的心理模型。通过一项在线研究(n=252),我们比较了两种主要类型的解释:1)以系统为中心的,它提供了关于系统如何处理话语并将术语与知识库相匹配的信息;2)社会的,它提供了关于其他用户如何成功与系统交互的信息。我们的研究结果表明,提供词汇的社会建议来添加到话语中,比以系统为中心的解释或词汇的社会建议来修改更能帮助用户修复和生成正确的流程。我们还发现,参与者通常理解自然语言系统的一些机制,例如术语与知识库的匹配,但他们通常缺乏其他关键知识,例如系统如何处理结构和排序。基于这些发现,我们提出了支持与自然语言系统交互和理解的设计建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信