In vitro methods: their relevance and complementarity in ocular safety assessment.

Lens and eye toxicity research Pub Date : 1992-01-01
A Rougier, M Cottin, O de Silva, R Roguet, P Catroux, A Toufic, K G Dossou
{"title":"In vitro methods: their relevance and complementarity in ocular safety assessment.","authors":"A Rougier,&nbsp;M Cottin,&nbsp;O de Silva,&nbsp;R Roguet,&nbsp;P Catroux,&nbsp;A Toufic,&nbsp;K G Dossou","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ocular irritation includes a wide variety of mechanisms some of which can be explored by in vitro methods. For example, the effects on epithelial cells that constitute the outer layers of both the conjunctiva and the cornea may result in direct cytotoxicity or impairment of cellular functions -such as impermeability-, phenomena that can be explored in vitro. Irritancy may also involve inflammation of the conjunctival connective tissue and of the corneal stroma with its vascular and cellular features; effects on the stroma can lead to the opacification of the cornea; this last phenomenon may be the consequence of mechanisms such as modification of the structure of proteins or changes in stroma hydration which in particular is closely related to corneal endothelium metabolic activity. Recovery after eye injury depends partly on the extent of ocular damage and on the residual mitotic activity of the remaining cells. We have studied 41 surfactants, lotions and shampoos in 6 to 8 in vitro methods each one exploring one or two endpoints that could be linked to the ocular irritancy phenomena described above. In vivo ocular irritancy data for these materials from previous studies were compared to in vitro results. The results obtained show that -among the techniques that were investigated and for the categories of substances that were studied- the Het-CAM test and more particularly the endpoint that is related to vascular effects gives the best assessment of acute ocular irritancy (Spearman's rho coefficients between in vivo and in vitro data greater than 0.90); however, cell culture methods, especially one based on short contact time between cells and products and on evaluation of early toxic effects, also proved interesting (Spearman's rho coefficients between in vivo and in vitro data greater than 0.85). Moreover, the isolated cornea opacity and permeability test gave complementary information more related to recovery from surfactant-induced damage. These encouraging results lead us to consider in vitro ocular safety assessment with optimism for the categories of products investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":17964,"journal":{"name":"Lens and eye toxicity research","volume":"9 3-4","pages":"229-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lens and eye toxicity research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ocular irritation includes a wide variety of mechanisms some of which can be explored by in vitro methods. For example, the effects on epithelial cells that constitute the outer layers of both the conjunctiva and the cornea may result in direct cytotoxicity or impairment of cellular functions -such as impermeability-, phenomena that can be explored in vitro. Irritancy may also involve inflammation of the conjunctival connective tissue and of the corneal stroma with its vascular and cellular features; effects on the stroma can lead to the opacification of the cornea; this last phenomenon may be the consequence of mechanisms such as modification of the structure of proteins or changes in stroma hydration which in particular is closely related to corneal endothelium metabolic activity. Recovery after eye injury depends partly on the extent of ocular damage and on the residual mitotic activity of the remaining cells. We have studied 41 surfactants, lotions and shampoos in 6 to 8 in vitro methods each one exploring one or two endpoints that could be linked to the ocular irritancy phenomena described above. In vivo ocular irritancy data for these materials from previous studies were compared to in vitro results. The results obtained show that -among the techniques that were investigated and for the categories of substances that were studied- the Het-CAM test and more particularly the endpoint that is related to vascular effects gives the best assessment of acute ocular irritancy (Spearman's rho coefficients between in vivo and in vitro data greater than 0.90); however, cell culture methods, especially one based on short contact time between cells and products and on evaluation of early toxic effects, also proved interesting (Spearman's rho coefficients between in vivo and in vitro data greater than 0.85). Moreover, the isolated cornea opacity and permeability test gave complementary information more related to recovery from surfactant-induced damage. These encouraging results lead us to consider in vitro ocular safety assessment with optimism for the categories of products investigated.

体外方法在眼安全性评价中的相关性和互补性。
眼部刺激包括多种机制,其中一些可以通过体外方法探索。例如,对构成结膜和角膜外层的上皮细胞的影响可能导致直接的细胞毒性或细胞功能的损害-例如不渗透性-可以在体外探索的现象。刺激也可能涉及结膜结缔组织和角膜基质及其血管和细胞特征的炎症;对角膜基质的影响可导致角膜混浊;后一种现象可能是蛋白质结构改变或基质水化变化等机制的结果,而基质水化与角膜内皮代谢活性密切相关。眼损伤后的恢复部分取决于眼损伤的程度和剩余细胞的残余有丝分裂活性。我们研究了41种表面活性剂、乳液和洗发水,用了6到8种体外方法,每一种方法都探索了一个或两个可能与上述眼睛刺激现象有关的终点。将先前研究中这些材料的体内眼刺激数据与体外结果进行比较。所获得的结果表明,在所研究的技术和所研究的物质类别中,Het-CAM测试,特别是与血管效应相关的终点,可以最好地评估急性眼刺激(体内和体外数据之间的Spearman rho系数大于0.90);然而,细胞培养方法,特别是基于细胞与产物之间短接触时间和早期毒性效应评估的方法,也被证明是有趣的(Spearman体内和体外数据之间的rho系数大于0.85)。此外,离体角膜混浊和通透性试验提供了更多与表面活性剂引起的损伤恢复相关的补充信息。这些令人鼓舞的结果使我们考虑对所调查的产品类别进行乐观的体外眼安全性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信