Notes on non-interactive secure comparison in "image feature extraction in the encrypted domain with privacy-preserving SIFT"

M. Schneider, T. Schneider
{"title":"Notes on non-interactive secure comparison in \"image feature extraction in the encrypted domain with privacy-preserving SIFT\"","authors":"M. Schneider, T. Schneider","doi":"10.1145/2600918.2600927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protocols for secure comparison are a fundamental building block of many privacy-preserving protocols such as privacy-preserving face recognition or privacy-preserving fingerprint authentication. So far, all existing secure comparison protocols that have been used in practical implementations require interaction.\n In recent work, Hsu et al. (IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2012) propose protocols for privacy-preserving computation of the scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) in the encrypted domain. Their fundamental building block is a new protocol for performing secure comparisons under additively homomorphic encryption that requires no interaction.\n In this paper we present potential for optimization and shortcomings of their secure comparison protocol. More specifically, we show that it 1) allows optimizations by shifting computation from the server to the user, 2) removes the gain that the user has in outsourcing computations to the server, and most importantly is 3) either computationally intractable for the server or insecure. As alternatives we propose to use either interactive comparison protocols or non-interactive somewhat or fully homomorphic encryption.","PeriodicalId":243756,"journal":{"name":"Information Hiding and Multimedia Security Workshop","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Hiding and Multimedia Security Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2600918.2600927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Protocols for secure comparison are a fundamental building block of many privacy-preserving protocols such as privacy-preserving face recognition or privacy-preserving fingerprint authentication. So far, all existing secure comparison protocols that have been used in practical implementations require interaction. In recent work, Hsu et al. (IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2012) propose protocols for privacy-preserving computation of the scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) in the encrypted domain. Their fundamental building block is a new protocol for performing secure comparisons under additively homomorphic encryption that requires no interaction. In this paper we present potential for optimization and shortcomings of their secure comparison protocol. More specifically, we show that it 1) allows optimizations by shifting computation from the server to the user, 2) removes the gain that the user has in outsourcing computations to the server, and most importantly is 3) either computationally intractable for the server or insecure. As alternatives we propose to use either interactive comparison protocols or non-interactive somewhat or fully homomorphic encryption.
“保护隐私的SIFT加密域图像特征提取”中非交互式安全比较的注意事项
用于安全比较的协议是许多隐私保护协议(如隐私保护面部识别或隐私保护指纹身份验证)的基本组成部分。到目前为止,在实际实现中使用的所有现有安全比较协议都需要交互。在最近的工作中,Hsu等人(IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2012)提出了加密域中尺度不变特征变换(SIFT)的隐私保护计算协议。它们的基本构建块是在不需要交互的加法同态加密下执行安全比较的新协议。在本文中,我们提出了优化的潜力和他们的安全比较协议的缺点。更具体地说,我们表明它1)通过将计算从服务器转移到用户来实现优化,2)消除了用户在将计算外包给服务器时获得的收益,最重要的是3)服务器在计算上难以处理或不安全。作为替代方案,我们建议使用交互式比较协议或非交互式部分或完全同态加密。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信