Public perception of ethical issues concerning automated mobility: A focus group study among three road user categories

Ebru Dogan, Cécile Barbier, Estelle Peyrard
{"title":"Public perception of ethical issues concerning automated mobility: A focus group study among three road user categories","authors":"Ebru Dogan, Cécile Barbier, Estelle Peyrard","doi":"10.1145/3452853.3452877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the deployment of automated vehicles (AV) progresses, questions about the public acceptance and ethical issues raised by automated mobility emerge. The present focus group study aimed at examining the ethical issues related to the AVs as perceived by road users through two scenarios. Nineteen participants in three groups, namely, drivers, pedestrians, and road users with disabilities, participated in the study. The three major principles that concerned all road user groups were responsibility, human autonomy, and wellbeing. For the road users with disabilities social justice was additionally a paramount issue, while for drivers it was privacy. The scenarios revealed both similarities and discrepancies in worries and expectations of different road user categories.","PeriodicalId":334884,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 32nd European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 32nd European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3452853.3452877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

As the deployment of automated vehicles (AV) progresses, questions about the public acceptance and ethical issues raised by automated mobility emerge. The present focus group study aimed at examining the ethical issues related to the AVs as perceived by road users through two scenarios. Nineteen participants in three groups, namely, drivers, pedestrians, and road users with disabilities, participated in the study. The three major principles that concerned all road user groups were responsibility, human autonomy, and wellbeing. For the road users with disabilities social justice was additionally a paramount issue, while for drivers it was privacy. The scenarios revealed both similarities and discrepancies in worries and expectations of different road user categories.
公众对自动驾驶车辆伦理问题的看法:三种道路使用者类别的焦点小组研究
随着自动驾驶汽车(AV)部署的推进,公众对自动驾驶的接受度和道德问题也随之出现。本焦点小组研究旨在透过两种情况,探讨道路使用者对自动驾驶汽车的道德问题。共有19名参与者参加了这项研究,他们分为三组,分别是司机、行人和残疾道路使用者。涉及所有道路使用者群体的三个主要原则是责任、人类自主和福祉。对于残疾道路使用者来说,社会公正也是一个最重要的问题,而对于司机来说,这是隐私。这些情景揭示了不同类别道路使用者在担忧和期望方面的相似之处和差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信