Порівняння ефективності рідинної ресусцитації хворих із септичним шоком розчинами рінгер-малат та ізотонічним розчином натрію хлориду

Цзо Тінлань, Ф. С. Глумчер, Є. В. Дьомін
{"title":"Порівняння ефективності рідинної ресусцитації хворих із септичним шоком розчинами рінгер-малат та ізотонічним розчином натрію хлориду","authors":"Цзо Тінлань, Ф. С. Глумчер, Є. В. Дьомін","doi":"10.25284/2519-2078.4(85).2018.151504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the key elements of therapy for sepsis and septic shock is the fluid replacement. Current guidelines suggests an insfusion of at least 30 ml / kg of crystalloid in the first three hours, and if necessary, more. Preference is given to balanced crystalloid solutions, but the choice of a particular solution remains unclear. A randomized, controlled study of the “Ringer-Malat” balanced crystalloid solution was performed, compared with isotonic saline for primary resuscitation of septic shock patients. The study involved 48 patients randomized to ringer malate (experimental) and 0.9% sodium chloride (control) group. The 30-day mortality rate was not significantly different between the groups (20.0% and 21.4% respectively, p = 0.521), but the trend was noted for less time on vasopressor support (58.2 versus 74.3 hours, respectively, p = 0.072), higher delivery of oxygen (1064.26 vs. 612.38 ml / min, p <0.001), greater clearance of lactate (22.14% vs. 16.28% p <0.001). In the Ringer Malate group, no cases of hyperchloremic acidosis were noted, and in the control group there were 3 cases (13.04%). Thus, the use of balanced crystalloids (in particular, Ringer Malat) allows for better results in the treatment of septic shock compared with isotonic sodium chloride solution, although additional studies on a larger scale are needed to determine the effect on mortality.","PeriodicalId":355172,"journal":{"name":"Pain, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25284/2519-2078.4(85).2018.151504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the key elements of therapy for sepsis and septic shock is the fluid replacement. Current guidelines suggests an insfusion of at least 30 ml / kg of crystalloid in the first three hours, and if necessary, more. Preference is given to balanced crystalloid solutions, but the choice of a particular solution remains unclear. A randomized, controlled study of the “Ringer-Malat” balanced crystalloid solution was performed, compared with isotonic saline for primary resuscitation of septic shock patients. The study involved 48 patients randomized to ringer malate (experimental) and 0.9% sodium chloride (control) group. The 30-day mortality rate was not significantly different between the groups (20.0% and 21.4% respectively, p = 0.521), but the trend was noted for less time on vasopressor support (58.2 versus 74.3 hours, respectively, p = 0.072), higher delivery of oxygen (1064.26 vs. 612.38 ml / min, p <0.001), greater clearance of lactate (22.14% vs. 16.28% p <0.001). In the Ringer Malate group, no cases of hyperchloremic acidosis were noted, and in the control group there were 3 cases (13.04%). Thus, the use of balanced crystalloids (in particular, Ringer Malat) allows for better results in the treatment of septic shock compared with isotonic sodium chloride solution, although additional studies on a larger scale are needed to determine the effect on mortality.
脓毒症和感染性休克治疗的关键因素之一是补液。目前的指导方针建议在头三个小时内至少输液30ml / kg的晶体,必要时可以更多。优先考虑平衡的晶体溶液,但选择特定的溶液仍不清楚。进行了一项随机对照研究,比较了“Ringer-Malat”平衡晶体溶液与等渗生理盐水用于感染性休克患者的初级复苏。48例患者随机分为苹果酸林格组(实验组)和0.9%氯化钠组(对照组)。30天死亡率在两组间无显著差异(分别为20.0%和21.4%,p = 0.521),但血管加压剂支持时间较短(分别为58.2和74.3小时,p = 0.072)、供氧量较高(1064.26和612.38 ml / min, p <0.001)、乳酸清除率较高(22.14%和16.28% p <0.001)。苹果酸林格组无高氯血症性酸中毒,对照组3例(13.04%)。因此,与等渗氯化钠溶液相比,使用平衡晶体(特别是林格玛拉特)治疗感染性休克的效果更好,尽管还需要更大规模的研究来确定其对死亡率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信