Generating Counterexamples in the form of Unit Tests from Hoare-style Verification Attempts

Amirfarhad Nilizadeh, Marlon Calvo, Gary T. Leavens, D. Cok
{"title":"Generating Counterexamples in the form of Unit Tests from Hoare-style Verification Attempts","authors":"Amirfarhad Nilizadeh, Marlon Calvo, Gary T. Leavens, D. Cok","doi":"10.1145/3524482.3527656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unit tests that demonstrate why a program is incorrect have many potential uses, including localizing bugs (i.e., showing where code is wrong), improving test suites, and better code synthesis. However, counterexamples produced by failed attempts at Hoare-style verification (e.g., by SMT solvers) are difficult to translate into unit tests. We explain how to generate unit tests from counterexamples generated by an SMT solver and how this process could be embodied in a prototype tool. This process combines static verification techniques and runtime assertion checking.","PeriodicalId":119264,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/ACM 10th International Conference on Formal Methods in Software Engineering (FormaliSE)","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/ACM 10th International Conference on Formal Methods in Software Engineering (FormaliSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3524482.3527656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Unit tests that demonstrate why a program is incorrect have many potential uses, including localizing bugs (i.e., showing where code is wrong), improving test suites, and better code synthesis. However, counterexamples produced by failed attempts at Hoare-style verification (e.g., by SMT solvers) are difficult to translate into unit tests. We explain how to generate unit tests from counterexamples generated by an SMT solver and how this process could be embodied in a prototype tool. This process combines static verification techniques and runtime assertion checking.
从hoare风格的验证尝试中以单元测试的形式生成反例
证明程序为什么不正确的单元测试有许多潜在的用途,包括定位错误(即,显示代码错误的地方),改进测试套件,以及更好的代码合成。然而,在Hoare-style验证(例如,SMT求解器)中失败的尝试所产生的反例很难转化为单元测试。我们解释了如何从SMT求解器生成的反例中生成单元测试,以及如何将此过程体现在原型工具中。这个过程结合了静态验证技术和运行时断言检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信